root/fusion
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

feat(KB-341): unify steeringComments and comments into single comments system

Browse Source 
- Consolidate steeringComments and comments into unified comments field using TaskComment type

- Remove SteeringComment type, migrate all comments to TaskComment format

- Update addComment to delegate to addTaskComment with auto-refinement for done tasks

- Merge legacy steeringComments data into comments during database migration

- Update dashboard API endpoint from /steer to /comments

- Update executor to use unified comments field for real-time injection

- Update PR comment handler to use addTaskComment method
This commit is contained in:
gsxdsm
2026-04-01 07:44:04 -07:00
parent c1ca8a4316
commit 021055c82a
38 changed files with 1198 additions and 143 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

26
packages/engine/src/pr-comment-handler.test.ts
View File

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ import { PrCommentHandler } from "./pr-comment-handler.js";
import type { TaskStore, Task } from "@fusion/core";
const mockStore = {
addComment: vi.fn<(id: string, text: string, author?: "user" | "agent") => Promise<Task>>(),
addTaskComment: vi.fn<(id: string, text: string, author?: string) => Promise<Task>>(),
createTask: vi.fn<(input: Parameters<TaskStore["createTask"]>[0]) => Promise<Task>>().mockResolvedValue({ id: "FN-123" } as Task),
} as unknown as TaskStore;
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ describe("PrCommentHandler", () => {
},
]);
expect(mockStore.addComment).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockStore.addTaskComment).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
});
});
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ describe("PrCommentHandler", () => {
{ body: "Consider using a different approach", keyword: "consider" },
{ body: "I suggest renaming this", keyword: "suggest" },
{ body: "Recommend adding tests", keyword: "recommend" },
])("creates steering comment for actionable feedback containing '$keyword': $body", async ({ body }) => {
])("creates comment for actionable feedback containing '$keyword': $body", async ({ body }) => {
await handler.handleNewComments("FN-001", mockPrInfo, [
{
id: 1,
@@ -77,12 +77,12 @@ describe("PrCommentHandler", () => {
},
]);
expect(mockStore.addComment).toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockStore.addTaskComment).toHaveBeenCalled();
});
});
describe("code suggestions", () => {
it("creates steering comment for comments with code blocks", async () => {
it("creates comment for comments with code blocks", async () => {
await handler.handleNewComments("FN-001", mockPrInfo, [
{
id: 1,
@@ -94,10 +94,10 @@ describe("PrCommentHandler", () => {
},
]);
expect(mockStore.addComment).toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockStore.addTaskComment).toHaveBeenCalled();
});
it("creates steering comment for inline code suggestions", async () => {
it("creates comment for inline code suggestions", async () => {
await handler.handleNewComments("FN-001", mockPrInfo, [
{
id: 1,
@@ -109,11 +109,11 @@ describe("PrCommentHandler", () => {
},
]);
expect(mockStore.addComment).toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(mockStore.addTaskComment).toHaveBeenCalled();
});
});
describe("steering comment content", () => {
describe("comment content", () => {
it("includes PR info and comment details", async () => {
await handler.handleNewComments("FN-001", mockPrInfo, [
{
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ describe("PrCommentHandler", () => {
},
]);
const call = (mockStore.addComment as ReturnType<typeof vi.fn>).mock.calls[0];
const call = (mockStore.addTaskComment as ReturnType<typeof vi.fn>).mock.calls[0];
const text = call[1] as string;
expect(text).toContain("PR Review Feedback");
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ describe("PrCommentHandler", () => {
},
]);
const call = (mockStore.addComment as ReturnType<typeof vi.fn>).mock.calls[0];
const call = (mockStore.addTaskComment as ReturnType<typeof vi.fn>).mock.calls[0];
const text = call[1] as string;
expect(text.length).toBeLessThan(longBody.length);
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ describe("PrCommentHandler", () => {
},
]);
expect(mockStore.addComment).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect(mockStore.addTaskComment).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
"FN-001",
expect.any(String),
"agent"
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ describe("PrCommentHandler", () => {
},
]);
const text = (mockStore.addComment as ReturnType<typeof vi.fn>).mock.calls[0][1] as string;
const text = (mockStore.addTaskComment as ReturnType<typeof vi.fn>).mock.calls[0][1] as string;
expect(text).toContain("This PR is already merged");
expect(text).toContain("follow-up work");
});