FN-6229: enforce symptom verification in triage and review

Require bug-class specs and reviews to prove original symptoms are reproduced and fixed.

- Add Symptom Verification guidance to triage prompt templates and self-review rules.
- Teach reviewer prompts to REVISE missing symptom verification or green-build-only acceptance.
- Document symptom-based acceptance alongside Surface Enumeration and cover the prompt contracts with tests.

Files changed:
 AGENTS.md                                      |  1 +
 docs/testing.md                                | 12 +++++++++++
 packages/engine/src/__tests__/reviewer.test.ts | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 packages/engine/src/__tests__/triage.test.ts   | 23 +++++++++++++++++---
 packages/engine/src/reviewer.ts                |  2 ++
 packages/engine/src/triage.ts                  | 20 ++++++++++++++++++
 6 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Fusion-Task-Id: FN-6229

Fusion-Task-Lineage: 01ad963f-c62b-410f-8571-57bc68307288
This commit is contained in:
gsxdsm
2026-06-11 00:04:39 -07:00
parent d68fe3e9f8
commit 1f366c8de1
6 changed files with 83 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@@ -124,6 +124,10 @@ Follow this structure exactly:
{Required for bug-fix tasks and UI-affordance add/remove tasks (adding, removing, or restructuring icons, buttons, chevrons/arrows, toggles, badges, menu entries, click targets): a checklist enumerating every surface the fixed invariant must hold across. Include every provider/bridge for streaming and agent paths; desktop AND mobile breakpoints; empty/undefined/duplicate/populated data states; and every hook/component/module that shares the affected logic. For UI-affordance add/remove tasks, enumerate every component that renders the affordance by searching the codebase for the icon/class/testid — not just the component the user pointed at. Explicitly check for leftover shells after removal (empty buttons, orphaned click targets, now-unused wrappers, dangling aria-labels) across both desktop and mobile breakpoints. Use the canonical checklist in docs/testing.md as the starting point.}
## Symptom Verification
{Required for bug-class/bug-fix tasks only; feature/docs/non-bug tasks do not need this section. Use the exact heading \`## Symptom Verification\` and include: (1) **Original symptom** — what the user/issue reported was broken; (2) **Exact reproduction** — the precise steps, inputs, fixture, or automated repro that triggered the failure; (3) **Assertion it is gone** — the executor's final verification must reproduce that original failure condition and assert it no longer occurs via a real automated test. Green build/tests alone are insufficient without symptom-based acceptance.}
## Dependencies
- **None**
@@ -168,6 +172,11 @@ For bug-fix and UI-affordance add/remove tasks, paste and fill in this checklist
- [ ] Every component that renders the affordance (search the codebase for the icon/class/testid, not just the one the user pointed at)
- [ ] Leftover shells after removal — empty buttons, orphaned click targets, now-unused wrappers, dangling aria-labels — are explicitly checked and fixed/hidden
For bug-class/bug-fix tasks, add and fill in the exact \`## Symptom Verification\` section:
- [ ] **Original symptom** — what the user/issue reported was broken
- [ ] **Exact reproduction** — the precise steps, inputs, fixture, or automated repro that triggered the failure
- [ ] **Assertion it is gone** — final verification reproduces the original failure condition and asserts it no longer occurs via a real automated test; green build/tests alone are insufficient
**Artifacts:**
- \`path/to/file\` (new | modified)
@@ -245,6 +254,7 @@ tests. Manual verification is NOT a test.
- For bug fixes and UI-affordance add/remove tasks, the spec MUST include a \`## Surface Enumeration\` section. During self-review via \`fn_review_spec()\`, treat a missing section on a bug-fix or UI-affordance add/remove spec as a blocking REVISE.
- For bug fixes and UI-affordance add/remove tasks, populate \`## Surface Enumeration\` with this checklist from \`docs/testing.md\`: providers/bridges/execution paths; desktop + mobile breakpoints/platforms; empty/undefined/duplicate/populated data states; shared hooks/components/modules/helpers; every component that renders the affordance; leftover shells after removal.
- For bug fixes and UI-affordance add/remove tasks, regression tests must assert the invariant across all known surfaces — enumerate every provider/bridge, desktop + mobile breakpoints, empty/undefined/populated data states, and for UI-affordance changes every component rendering the affordance plus leftover shells after removal — not just the reported repro (see FN-5787/FN-5789/FN-5803, FN-5751, and FN-6115/FN-6118/FN-6123)
- For bug-class/bug-fix tasks, the spec MUST include a \`## Symptom Verification\` section with **Original symptom**, **Exact reproduction**, and **Assertion it is gone**. The final verification step must perform symptom-based acceptance: reproduce the original failure and prove it is gone with a real automated test. Green build/tests alone are insufficient. Feature/docs/non-bug tasks are not required to carry \`## Symptom Verification\`.
- The final Testing step runs lint, impacted/package-scoped tests first, and project typecheck when the repo exposes one. Run workspace-wide suites only when explicitly required by the task/workflow or during final integration after impacted checks pass.
- Specs must instruct executors to fix lint failures and quality-gate failures directly, even when the required edits extend beyond the original File Scope
- If the project has no test framework, the Testing step must include setting one up
@@ -438,6 +448,10 @@ Follow this structure exactly:
{Required for bug-fix tasks and UI-affordance add/remove tasks (adding, removing, or restructuring icons, buttons, chevrons/arrows, toggles, badges, menu entries, click targets): a checklist enumerating every surface the fixed invariant must hold across. Include every provider/bridge for streaming and agent paths; desktop AND mobile breakpoints; empty/undefined/duplicate/populated data states; and every hook/component/module that shares the affected logic. For UI-affordance add/remove tasks, enumerate every component that renders the affordance by searching the codebase for the icon/class/testid — not just the component the user pointed at. Explicitly check for leftover shells after removal (empty buttons, orphaned click targets, now-unused wrappers, dangling aria-labels) across both desktop and mobile breakpoints. Use the canonical checklist in docs/testing.md as the starting point.}
## Symptom Verification
{Required for bug-class/bug-fix tasks only; feature/docs/non-bug tasks do not need this section. Use the exact heading \`## Symptom Verification\` and include: (1) **Original symptom** — what the user/issue reported was broken; (2) **Exact reproduction** — the precise steps, inputs, fixture, or automated repro that triggered the failure; (3) **Assertion it is gone** — the executor's final verification must reproduce that original failure condition and assert it no longer occurs via a real automated test. Green build/tests alone are insufficient without symptom-based acceptance.}
## Dependencies
- **None**
@@ -482,6 +496,11 @@ For bug-fix and UI-affordance add/remove tasks, paste and fill in this checklist
- [ ] Every component that renders the affordance (search the codebase for the icon/class/testid, not just the one the user pointed at)
- [ ] Leftover shells after removal — empty buttons, orphaned click targets, now-unused wrappers, dangling aria-labels — are explicitly checked and fixed/hidden
For bug-class/bug-fix tasks, add and fill in the exact \`## Symptom Verification\` section:
- [ ] **Original symptom** — what the user/issue reported was broken
- [ ] **Exact reproduction** — the precise steps, inputs, fixture, or automated repro that triggered the failure
- [ ] **Assertion it is gone** — final verification reproduces the original failure condition and asserts it no longer occurs via a real automated test; green build/tests alone are insufficient
**Artifacts:**
- \`path/to/file\` (new | modified)
@@ -554,6 +573,7 @@ If this task REMOVES existing functionality (deleting modules, settings, API end
- For bug fixes and UI-affordance add/remove tasks, the spec MUST include a \`## Surface Enumeration\` section. During self-review via \`fn_review_spec()\`, treat a missing section on a bug-fix or UI-affordance add/remove spec as a blocking REVISE.
- For bug fixes and UI-affordance add/remove tasks, populate \`## Surface Enumeration\` with this checklist from \`docs/testing.md\`: providers/bridges/execution paths; desktop + mobile breakpoints/platforms; empty/undefined/duplicate/populated data states; shared hooks/components/modules/helpers; every component that renders the affordance; leftover shells after removal.
- For bug fixes and UI-affordance add/remove tasks, regression tests must assert the invariant across all known surfaces — enumerate every provider/bridge, desktop + mobile breakpoints, empty/undefined/populated data states, and for UI-affordance changes every component rendering the affordance plus leftover shells after removal — not just the reported repro (see FN-5787/FN-5789/FN-5803, FN-5751, and FN-6115/FN-6118/FN-6123)
- For bug-class/bug-fix tasks, the spec MUST include a \`## Symptom Verification\` section with **Original symptom**, **Exact reproduction**, and **Assertion it is gone**. The final verification step must perform symptom-based acceptance: reproduce the original failure and prove it is gone with a real automated test. Green build/tests alone are insufficient. Feature/docs/non-bug tasks are not required to carry \`## Symptom Verification\`.
- Include targeted tests in implementation steps and full quality-gate runs in final verification
## Duplicate check