feat(FN-3314): align auth route assertion in agents routes test
Test FN-3314 completes its final step by refining an auth route assertion in the agents routes test, ensuring the test accurately validates the expected behavior. Fusion-Task-Id: FN-3314
This commit is contained in:
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ function createMockStore(overrides: Partial<TaskStore> = {}): TaskStore {
|
||||
return {
|
||||
getSettings: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ remoteAccess: buildRemoteAccessSettings() }),
|
||||
updateSettings: vi.fn(async (patch: Record<string, unknown>) => patch),
|
||||
updateGlobalSettings: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined),
|
||||
getRootDir: vi.fn().mockReturnValue("/fake/root"),
|
||||
getFusionDir: vi.fn().mockReturnValue("/fake/root/.fusion"),
|
||||
getDatabase: vi.fn().mockReturnValue({
|
||||
@@ -125,13 +126,13 @@ beforeEach(() => {
|
||||
|
||||
describe("remote access provider/lifecycle contracts", () => {
|
||||
it("switches active provider and rejects invalid provider values", async () => {
|
||||
const updateSettings = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
||||
const { app } = createApp({ store: createMockStore({ updateSettings }) });
|
||||
const updateGlobalSettings = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
||||
const { app } = createApp({ store: createMockStore({ updateGlobalSettings }) });
|
||||
|
||||
const activate = await REQUEST(app, "POST", "/api/remote/provider/activate", { provider: "tailscale" });
|
||||
expect(activate.status).toBe(200);
|
||||
expect(activate.body).toEqual({ activeProvider: "tailscale" });
|
||||
expect(updateSettings).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
expect(updateGlobalSettings).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
remoteAccess: expect.objectContaining({ activeProvider: "tailscale" }),
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -144,17 +145,17 @@ describe("remote access provider/lifecycle contracts", () => {
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("seeds defaults when activating a provider on a fresh project", async () => {
|
||||
const updateSettings = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
||||
const updateGlobalSettings = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
||||
const store = createMockStore({
|
||||
getSettings: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({}),
|
||||
updateSettings,
|
||||
updateGlobalSettings,
|
||||
});
|
||||
const { app } = createApp({ store });
|
||||
|
||||
const activate = await REQUEST(app, "POST", "/api/remote/provider/activate", { provider: "cloudflare" });
|
||||
|
||||
expect(activate.status).toBe(200);
|
||||
expect(updateSettings).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
expect(updateGlobalSettings).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
remoteAccess: expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
activeProvider: "cloudflare",
|
||||
}),
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -199,8 +199,8 @@ describe("remote access API route contracts", () => {
|
||||
lastError: null,
|
||||
}),
|
||||
};
|
||||
const updateSettings = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
||||
const store = createMockStore({ updateSettings });
|
||||
const updateGlobalSettings = vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined);
|
||||
const store = createMockStore({ updateGlobalSettings });
|
||||
const { app } = createApp({ store, engine });
|
||||
|
||||
const activateRes = await REQUEST(app, "POST", "/api/remote/provider/activate", { provider: "tailscale" });
|
||||
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ describe("remote access API route contracts", () => {
|
||||
|
||||
expect(engine.startRemoteTunnel.mock.calls.length).toBeLessThanOrEqual(1);
|
||||
expect(engine.stopRemoteTunnel.mock.calls.length).toBeLessThanOrEqual(1);
|
||||
expect(updateSettings).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
expect(updateGlobalSettings).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.objectContaining({
|
||||
remoteAccess: expect.objectContaining({ activeProvider: "tailscale" }),
|
||||
}));
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user