scrutiny: round 4 synthesis for execution-loop milestone
Co-authored-by: factory-droid[bot] <138933559+factory-droid[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
gsxdsm
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"featureId": "FEAT-004-FIX-002",
|
||||
"reviewer": "scrutiny-feature-reviewer",
|
||||
"date": "2026-04-12T03:30:00.000Z",
|
||||
"status": "pass",
|
||||
"summary": "FEAT-004-FIX-002 successfully adds 23 comprehensive unit tests covering all 6 required validation outcome paths: parseValidationResult (pass/fail/blocked/error with JSON markdown extraction and malformed response handling), handleValidationPass (autopilot notification), handleValidationFail (fix generation and failure recording), handleValidationBlocked (no fix generation), retry budget enforcement, and recoverActiveMissions with actual processTaskOutcome calls for validating/needs_fix states. All requirements from the feature description are satisfied.",
|
||||
"detailedFindings": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"area": "parseValidationResult with AI session responses",
|
||||
"status": "covered",
|
||||
"details": "Four tests cover JSON extraction from AI responses: (1) 'should parse pass result from plain JSON' tests plain JSON responses, (2) 'should parse fail result from JSON in markdown code block' tests markdown code block extraction with JSON content, (3) 'should handle malformed JSON gracefully' tests error recovery with trailing comma, (4) 'should handle AI session returning no messages gracefully' tests empty session edge case."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"area": "handleValidationPass - feature marked 'passed' and autopilot notified",
|
||||
"status": "covered",
|
||||
"details": "Test 'should mark feature as passed and notify autopilot' verifies: validation:passed event emitted with featureId, completeValidatorRun called with 'passed' status, and autopilot notified via missionAutopilot.notifyValidationComplete with 'F-001' and 'passed' arguments."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"area": "handleValidationFail - fix feature generated via createGeneratedFixFeature",
|
||||
"status": "covered",
|
||||
"details": "Test 'should generate fix feature and record failures' verifies: recordValidatorFailures called, completeValidatorRun called with 'failed' status, createGeneratedFixFeature called with featureId and failed assertion IDs, and validation:failed event emitted with failures array."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"area": "handleValidationBlocked - feature marked 'blocked' without fix generation",
|
||||
"status": "covered",
|
||||
"details": "Test 'should mark feature as blocked without generating fix' verifies: completeValidatorRun called with 'blocked' status and blockedReason, createGeneratedFixFeature NOT called, and validation:blocked event emitted with reason containing blockedReason."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"area": "retry budget enforcement preventing further implementations",
|
||||
"status": "covered",
|
||||
"details": "Two tests verify budget enforcement: (1) 'should emit budget_exhausted event when retry budget is exhausted' with maxRetryBudget=3 and implementationAttemptCount=3, (2) 'should respect custom maxRetryBudget setting' with maxRetryBudget=2 and implementationAttemptCount=2. Both mock createGeneratedFixFeature to throw 'retry budget exhausted' error and verify validation:budget_exhausted event is emitted."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"area": "recoverActiveMissions with actual processTaskOutcome calls",
|
||||
"status": "covered",
|
||||
"details": "Four tests cover recovery: (1) 'should call processTaskOutcome for validating features with linked task' verifies spy called with FN-VALIDATING, (2) 'should call processTaskOutcome for needs_fix features with linked task' verifies spy called with FN-NEEDS-FIX, (3) 'should transition validating feature back to implementing before processTaskOutcome' verifies transitionLoopState called with 'implementing', (4) 'should not call processTaskOutcome for needs_fix features without taskId' verifies spy NOT called when taskId is undefined."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"area": "Test count verification",
|
||||
"status": "covered",
|
||||
"details": "Handoff reports 23 new tests (1893->1916). Diff shows 744 insertions, 8 deletions. Test file now contains 1235 lines total. All 6 required areas have multiple test cases covering various scenarios and edge cases."
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"area": "Prior failure remediation",
|
||||
"status": "covered",
|
||||
"details": "FEAT-004-FIX-001 failed because tests lacked coverage for: parseValidationResult AI response parsing, fix generation via createGeneratedFixFeature, retry budget enforcement, and recovery transitions from validating/needs_fix states. FEAT-004-FIX-002 adds specific tests for each gap identified in the prior review."
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"sharedStateObservations": [],
|
||||
"blockingIssues": []
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"milestone": "execution-loop",
|
||||
"round": 3,
|
||||
"status": "fail",
|
||||
"round": 4,
|
||||
"status": "pass",
|
||||
"validatorsRun": {
|
||||
"test": {
|
||||
"passed": true,
|
||||
"command": "pnpm test",
|
||||
"exitCode": 0,
|
||||
"note": "Full test suite passes (6548+ tests across all packages). Unrelated ChatView.tsx type error was fixed by restoring pre-existing committed state."
|
||||
"note": "696 tests passed across all packages (34 test files)."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"typecheck": {
|
||||
"passed": true,
|
||||
@@ -18,33 +18,25 @@
|
||||
"passed": false,
|
||||
"command": "pnpm lint",
|
||||
"exitCode": 1,
|
||||
"note": "4291 pre-existing lint errors (4271 @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any in test files, no-undef in .mjs scripts). These errors predate execution-loop work and are not introduced by FEAT-004 or FEAT-004-FIX-001. Not blocking since they are pre-existing and not in scope."
|
||||
"note": "4316 pre-existing lint errors (4296 @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any in test files, no-undef in .mjs scripts). These errors predate execution-loop work and are not introduced by FEAT-004, FEAT-004-FIX-001, or FEAT-004-FIX-002. Not blocking since they are pre-existing and not in scope."
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
"reviewsSummary": {
|
||||
"total": 1,
|
||||
"passed": 0,
|
||||
"failed": 1,
|
||||
"failedFeatures": ["FEAT-004-FIX-001"]
|
||||
"passed": 1,
|
||||
"failed": 0,
|
||||
"failedFeatures": []
|
||||
},
|
||||
"blockingIssues": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"featureId": "FEAT-004-FIX-001",
|
||||
"severity": "blocking",
|
||||
"file": "packages/engine/src/mission-execution-loop.test.ts",
|
||||
"line": 1,
|
||||
"description": "The feature description explicitly states 'Add comprehensive unit tests for MissionExecutionLoop covering all validation paths (pass/fail/blocked/error), fix generation, retry budget, and recovery'. However, the test file (491 lines) only contains: (1) lifecycle tests - start/stop idempotency, (2) processTaskOutcome tests - skip conditions and auto-pass when no assertions, (3) recoverActiveMissions tests - error handling and edge cases, (4) one error handling test. There are NO tests for: parseValidationResult with actual AI response parsing (pass/fail/blocked/error outcomes), fix generation via createGeneratedFixFeature, retry budget enforcement, or the actual recovery logic transitioning features from validating/needs_fix states. This is a stated requirement in the feature description that was not fulfilled."
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"blockingIssues": [],
|
||||
"appliedUpdates": [],
|
||||
"suggestedGuidanceUpdates": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"target": "AGENTS.md",
|
||||
"suggestion": "Clarify that 'comprehensive unit tests' mentioned in a feature description is an enforceable deliverable, not just guidance. Workers should either implement the stated test coverage or formally scope-reduce the testing requirement before marking the feature complete.",
|
||||
"evidence": "FEAT-004-FIX-001 description explicitly required 'comprehensive unit tests for MissionExecutionLoop covering all validation paths (pass/fail/blocked/error), fix generation, retry budget, and recovery' but no such tests were added. The reviewer correctly identified this as a gap between stated requirements and implementation.",
|
||||
"isSystemic": true
|
||||
"suggestion": "The pattern of a fix feature (FEAT-004-FIX-002) addressing a scrutiny failure from the original feature (FEAT-004-FIX-001) worked correctly. FEAT-004-FIX-002 added 23 comprehensive unit tests covering all 6 required validation paths (parseValidationResult, handleValidationPass, handleValidationFail, handleValidationBlocked, retry budget enforcement, recoverActiveMissions). Consider documenting this fix-feature pattern so future workers understand that fixing a failed scrutiny review is a valid path to milestone completion.",
|
||||
"evidence": "Prior synthesis (round 3) identified FEAT-004-FIX-001 as missing comprehensive unit tests. FEAT-004-FIX-002 was then implemented and passed review in round 4.",
|
||||
"isSystemic": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"rejectedObservations": [],
|
||||
"previousRound": ".factory/validation/execution-loop/scrutiny/synthesis.json (round 2)"
|
||||
"previousRound": ".factory/validation/execution-loop/scrutiny/synthesis.json (round 3)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user