aedee4b8231bf050c3240a00ab6645ede5d87ee9
7 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
bf173dad7c |
FN-8696: keep reverted tasks out of Done
Keep reverted tasks out of completed views and give every task-detail host a revision recovery path. - Exclude reverted tasks from complete columns and group them in dedicated recovery lists. - Provide Delete and Revise actions in cards, lists, docks, modals, and popped-out details. - Add localized copy, documentation, regression coverage, and a patch changeset. Files changed: .changeset/fn-8696-reverted-task-resolution.md | 7 ++++ docs/dashboard-guide.md | 4 ++ packages/dashboard/app/App.tsx | 2 + packages/dashboard/app/components/AppModals.tsx | 2 + packages/dashboard/app/components/Board.tsx | 42 +++++++++++++++++++- packages/dashboard/app/components/DockTaskList.tsx | 21 +++++++++- packages/dashboard/app/components/ListView.tsx | 18 +++++++++ packages/dashboard/app/components/TaskCard.css | 4 ++ packages/dashboard/app/components/TaskCard.tsx | 9 +++++ .../dashboard/app/components/TaskDetailModal.tsx | 18 ++++++++- .../app/components/__tests__/Board.test.tsx | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++ .../app/components/__tests__/DockTaskList.test.tsx | 29 +++++++++++++- .../app/components/dashboard/MainContent.tsx | 4 ++ .../app/components/overflowViewRegistry.tsx | 3 ++ .../app/components/useRightDockController.tsx | 9 +++++ .../app/utils/__tests__/taskRevert.test.ts | 16 +++++++- packages/dashboard/app/utils/taskRevert.ts | 18 +++++++++ packages/i18n/locales/en/app.json | 3 ++ 18 files changed, 249 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) Fusion-Task-Id: FN-8696 Fusion-Task-Lineage: 7c9550fb-ef8e-4422-8ec1-0de1665413a3 Co-authored-by: Fusion (runfusion.ai) <noreply@runfusion.ai> |
||
|
|
920d68e10f |
fix(dashboard): expose column roles to browser bundle (#3151)
## Summary - export the browser-safe `@fusion/core/column-roles` subpath - keep Vite/Vitest aliases ahead of broad `@fusion/core` aliases - restore production dashboard builds after task undo classification adopted shared column-role helpers ## Test plan - `node scripts/check-no-node-only-core-imports-in-dashboard.mjs` - `FUSION_DASHBOARD_DEEP=1 pnpm --filter @fusion/dashboard exec vitest run app/utils/__tests__/taskRevert.test.ts --pool=threads --maxWorkers=1` - `pnpm --filter @fusion/core typecheck` - `pnpm --filter @fusion/dashboard typecheck` - `CI=true pnpm check:changesets` - `pnpm build` <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit * **Bug Fixes** * Fixed dashboard build compatibility for browser-based environments. * Improved reliability when importing column role functionality across supported application components. * **Refactor** * Made column role utilities available through a dedicated browser-safe entry point. * **Chores** * Updated development and test configurations to consistently resolve the new entry point. * Documented the browser-safe module classification and recorded the release patch. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> |
||
|
|
a8dae03fdb |
fleet(dashboard): taskRevert 2 → 0 — the recorded blocker named the wrong variable (#3129)
The largest remaining census cluster. Deferred twice, with a blocker that turns out to be false **in the same component where its counter-example already lives**. ## What the earlier notes got right `detailColumnFlags` describes the **modal's own task**, and the column classified here belongs to a **neighbour**. Supplying it would answer *"is this neighbour finished?"* with a different row's traits — wrong on data, not merely stale on vocabulary. That reasoning stands and I kept it. An earlier pass also converted this, left the parameter unsupplied, and **reverted it** — correctly. An unsupplied optional parameter is strictly worse than the literal: the guard is gone, the census counts a conversion, and the behaviour is the legacy fallback forever. That rule is why the wiring ships in this same commit. ## What the conclusion got wrong > "A correct conversion needs per-**neighbour** flags — which the modal does not have and should not fetch mid-render." `columnFlagsByTaskId` is a per-task map. It is **already a prop** of `TaskDetailModal` (declared :367, destructured :727), and the call site at :992 sits **below** that destructure. And `TaskDetailModal` already uses it exactly this way, for the near-duplicate canonical: ```ts columnFlagsByTaskId?.get(nearDuplicateCanonical.id) ``` …under a note observing that *its* blocker had been *"asserted from the shape of the problem rather than tested against what was in scope."* Same assertion, one function over. So the supplier the earlier note went looking for exists, is per-neighbour, and needs no fetch. ## What it fixes This lookup skips **finished** candidates so a done/archived prior undo attempt never renders as an active "Undo task" link. On a board that renames those lanes it matched neither — a finished undo task kept rendering as open, which is precisely the stale affordance the function's own header says it exists to prevent. ## Census | | before | after | |---|---|---| | `taskRevert.ts` | 2 | **0** | | repo backlog | 17 | **15** | ## Measured - 4 new cases; `taskRevert.test.ts` **11/11 pass**. - **MUTATION**: restoring the literal pair fails the renamed case. - **The negative is load-bearing.** The map is fail-soft, so a candidate it does not cover must still be treated as **open**, not skipped. A conversion that skipped unknown candidates would *hide live undo links* — failing in the direction nobody reports. - A **control** pins that an unwired caller (no flags at all) still skips the legacy ids, so the optional parameter cannot regress default boards. - `TaskDetailModal` suites — **31 files / 664 tests pass**. - `tsc --noEmit -p tsconfig.app.json` clean; census `--strict`, `check-lane-wiring`, `check-fnxc-future-dates` clean. ## Pattern worth noting This is the fourth deferral this session whose stated blocker had dissolved or misidentified itself, and the second where the counter-example was already in the same file. The common shape: a note records *why* something is blocked, is accurate when written, and is never re-checked — so the block outlives its cause. Re-reading them cost minutes each and returned two real conversions. Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
7763063cbd |
docs(task-revert): the recorded conversion "blocker" is a correctness boundary, not a cost (#2868)
`findOpenUndoTaskForSource` carries a note saying its conversion is blocked on **hoisting the flags derivation** in `TaskDetailModal` — framed as a hook-ordering cost in a 5000-line component, i.e. something somebody could pay. I went to pay it, and the framing is wrong in a way that would have produced a **worse defect than the literal**. ## Why hoisting would not unblock it This function scans the `tasks` list for **other** tasks pointing back at the source, so the column it classifies belongs to a **neighbour**. `detailColumnFlags` describes the **modal's own** task — its own FNXC note says exactly that, and it is guarded by `detailFlagsAreForThisTask` *precisely because* using it for anything else is wrong. So supplying it here would answer *"is this neighbour finished?"* with the modal task's traits. On a project where two workflows reuse a column id, an open undo task gets classified by a workflow it does not belong to, and the "Undo task" affordance vanishes or persists wrongly. **Wrong flags are worse than a stale vocabulary.** The literal is at least uniformly legacy; this would be wrong *on data*. It is the flags-for-the-wrong-row shape — the same question I have been applying all program: *do these flags describe the column of the row this guard is about?* ## What a correct conversion needs Per-**neighbour** flags: the caller would have to resolve each candidate's own workflow, which the modal does not have and should not fetch mid-render. Until a per-task lane map exists at that call site, **the literal is the right answer**. ## Why this is worth a PR rather than silence The previous note is an invitation. Somebody following it would land a plausible-looking conversion, drop the census count by one, and introduce a data-dependent bug that only appears on multi-workflow projects — the exact "conversion that scores as a win" pattern documented in `docs/solutions/workflow-learnings/`. The census entry stays and is now labelled as **accurate debt** rather than a missed conversion. No behaviour change; comment only. Dashboard app `tsc` clean, `pnpm lint` clean, `app/utils` suites 59 files / 689 tests green. Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
ba40942a10 |
batch-dashboard-app: 75 → 2 across packages/dashboard/app — the last two are deliberate, not missed (#2772)
**Batch branch is live: `batch-dashboard-app`.** Push conversions here as commits rather than opening per-file PRs — that is the CI-run bottleneck this model removes. **One-line ownership note for you to arbitrate:** you have addressed me as U11, U12 and U7 at different points, so the `u12 worker -> batch-dashboard-app` mapping is ambiguous from my side. I claimed it because `dashboard/app` is where I have done the most work this session (TaskContextMenu, Column, TaskCard, TaskDetailModal, columnRoles, taskActivity) and I know which of its guards are load-bearing fallbacks. **If another worker is the intended owner, say so and I will hand the branch over rather than both of us pushing to it** — two workers on one shared branch is exactly what silently discarded a reviewed fix in #2645 today. ## The work order (measured at branch point, tests excluded) **75 guards across 32 files.** Largest: `TaskContextMenu.tsx` 9 · `Column.tsx` 7 · `ListView.tsx` 6 · `TaskDetailModal.tsx` 4 · then a long tail of 3s, 2s and 1s. Full per-file list is in the committed work order so feeders can claim without re-measuring. ## Two rules this surface keeps tripping on **1. A literal after `??`, or in the `else` of a `flags ?` ternary, is a DEGRADED-MODE answer — not an unconverted guard.** Two real states reach it: the **pre-load window** (board renders before the workflows fetch resolves) and a card stranded on an id its workflow no longer declares. In both, `columnFlagsById` has no entry at all. Deleting the fallback does not remove a decision — it substitutes "no role" silently, and affordances vanish during first paint. Those sites reach 0 by **marking**, not deleting. Expect `TaskContextMenu.tsx` and the `utils` files to be **mostly marks**. A "9 → 0" that deleted 9 fallbacks is a regression wearing a green census. **2. A marker excuses ONLY the construct it is attached to** — the statement or function holding the literal, not a sibling declaration. This has cost three passes, two of them mine; my first attempt on `reliability-metrics.ts` scored **1 of 6**. **Verify by the count moving, not by the comment existing.** With the ratchet gate-blocking, a mis-marked batch either wedges the gate or locks the miss into a re-recorded baseline. ## Status Opening commit is the work order only — **0 of 75 converted so far.** I am near the end of my context, so I am establishing the branch and the shared list rather than starting conversions I cannot finish cleanly. Feeders can begin immediately; I will keep the branch rebased. My other PR **#2762** (`live-agent-count.ts` 6 → 0) is green and unconflicted — per your rule it should land rather than fold into a batch, and it is `packages/core` so it belongs to batch-core anyway. <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit * **New Features** * Task UI now resolves workflow “column roles” per task to drive diffs/merge details, routing/steering, progress/runtime visibility, and review badges. * Right-dock/overflow views and dev-server now use per-task column traits for “executing” behavior and dependency-based “Up Next” eligibility. * **Bug Fixes** * Fixed bulk action selection/delete/archive eligibility and prevented cross-workflow role leakage. * Made in-review/stale-paused-review, stuck, and effective executor/validator model logic role-aware. * **Tests** * Added regression coverage for degraded-flag behavior and ensured resolved-flag props aren’t ignored. * Added a static check to fail builds on inert optional flag seams. * **Documentation** * Updated batch work-order and mega-batch branch guidance. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --- ## Late addition: the seam gate was masking a real offender `scripts/check-inert-flag-seams.mjs` matched call sites by NAME, so two same-named functions in different modules were conflated. I had documented that as a known false-positive source and moved on — reports mentioning `sortTasksForDisplayColumn` are noise, read past them. That annotation was the damage. Core's `sortTasksForDisplayColumn` genuinely never receives its `columnFlags` argument outside its own tests. The dashboard's separate function of the same name (`app/components/taskSorting.ts`), called with up to five arguments from `Lane`/`Board`/`ListView`, was raising the arg-count max and clearing core's seam. The offender was behind a row everyone had been told to skip. The gate now records the module each callee is imported from and matches it against the seam's declaring module. **Measured, by reverting the change:** the scan prints `17 seams, all supplied` and emits **no row** for the function. With the change, it is reported. Both directions watched. Reported on #2783 rather than fixed from outside — core owns it, and "wire the flags" vs "drop the parameter and let the literal stay counted" is their judgment call. TEMPORARY allow-list entry carries it meanwhile; the existing staleness check fails the moment the site becomes supplied, so the entry cannot outlive the fix. Two known limits remain, both inherent to name matching and both documented in the script: the one-supplier floor, and the `__tests__` exclusion (hence the two permanent `ALLOWED` entries). ## And the one-supplier floor, closed the same way I wrote in the section above that the floor "hasn't cost anything yet." That is verbatim the reasoning that kept the imported-shadow bug alive, so I closed it instead of leaving the note. `best < arity` asked only whether SOME caller supplied the argument. One correct call site cleared the seam while every sibling took the legacy fallback — the `isTaskStuck` defect class, where two of three sites omitted the flags and the gate stayed green because the third was right. Review caught that one. A partially-supplied seam is the harder of the two: wholly-unsupplied is uniformly wrong, this works on the board you tested and degrades on the column you did not. **Measured:** dropping the flags argument at `Column.tsx`'s supplied call site produces `supplied by 5/6 call sites; omitted at packages/dashboard/app/components/Column.tsx:1 (of 2)`; restoring returns `all supplied at every call site`. Red and green both watched. Two real omissions found, both on `isNearDuplicateCanonicalInactive`: - **`TaskDetailModal.tsx`** — deliberate, and it **corrects a note I left at that site**. The old note said hoisting the flags state was "the actual fix." It is not, for this call: the flags in scope describe the *modal's* task, and the canonical is a **different task** on a column this component never resolves. Passing them would type-check, read as a conversion, and answer about the wrong task — exactly what `column-role-degraded-flags.test.ts` exists to catch. Supplying it correctly needs a fetch, which is a data change and out of scope. - **`core/task-store/branch-group-ops.ts`** — genuinely wireable (the impl is async and already holds `store` and `canonicalId`). Reported on #2783, not edited from outside. Exemptions for this class are keyed by **call site** (`<file>::<function>`), not by function name. A name-level entry would waive every site of a partially-supplied seam, which is backwards — its other sites are correct and are the reason the omission is worth reporting. Both entries carry the same staleness check as the name-level list and cannot outlive their fix. Remaining known limit, now the only one: the `__tests__` exclusion, which makes a test-only export read as having no callers. That is what the two permanent `ALLOWED` entries are. ## The `__tests__` exclusion, and two allow-list entries built on false reasons Named as the "last remaining limit" above, so it got closed too. The scan now reads test files for call sites — but counts them **separately**, and a test never clears a seam. That direction is the dangerous one: counting test callers as suppliers would have re-hidden core's `sortTasksForDisplayColumn`, whose only suppliers are its own tests. Measured by lifting its exemption: still reported. Both permanent allow-list entries claimed the scanner couldn't see their callers. **Both reasons were false**, and reading tests is what proved it: - **`evaluateMergeBlockerGuard`** — zero callers in tests either. Its only reference in the repo is its own declaration; never registered as a trait hook; the `evaluateDefaultWorkflowGuards` reader its file header credits does not exist. The `lifecycleColumns` conversion went onto dead code, and its note describes a crossing the guard cannot make. Reported on #2783, including the two things I am explicitly *not* concluding (no `"guard"` hook is registered in production; whether that is residue or a dropped registration needs core's intent). - **`isRecoverableMissingWorktreeReviewFailure`** — 5 test call sites. It wraps `...WithProgress`/`...NoProgress`, the live pair called from `self-healing.ts`, both supplying `reviewColumns`. Entry kept, true reason recorded. ### A wrong turn, recorded because it is the failure mode this PR is about I first classified no-production-caller seams as *informational* when they weren't re-exported from a package index, reasoning that a public export might be called externally. That silently downgraded `sortTasksForDisplayColumn` — a confirmed real offender — from failing to a footnote. Publication status has nothing to do with whether there is production behaviour to be wrong. Reverted to the simple rule: no production caller means inert, and it fails. It is worth stating plainly because it is the exact shape of everything else in this PR: a change that made the gate read *cleaner* while making it catch *less*, and it type-checked, passed every test, and would have reviewed fine. ### Where that leaves the check Every blind spot named in this PR has now been closed, and **each one produced a real defect within minutes of closing it** — imported shadows, the one-supplier floor, the `__tests__` exclusion. Four verified findings went to core, one to engine. I would not read the remaining ~240 guards' green gates as evidence that they are clean; I would read them as untested. ## Two guards for one question, one of them worse Having hardened the script, I checked its older twin rather than assuming it was fine. `resolved-flags-seams-have-suppliers.test.ts` carried its own copy of the trailing-flags-parameter check — written before the script existed — with **all three** holes the script has since closed. **Measured on one reintroduced defect** (dropping the flags argument at `Column.tsx`'s supplied `isNearDuplicateCanonicalInactive` call): | | result | |---|---| | `scripts/check-inert-flag-seams.mjs` | `supplied by 5/6 call sites; omitted at .../Column.tsx:1 (of 2)` | | this test's arity half | **3 passed** | Deleted the arity half. Redundancy between a strong and a weak check isn't redundancy — it's a green result available to whoever runs the weak one, and there was no signal at the call site telling you which you were looking at. The **props-shape half stays**: it has no twin in the script, and I confirmed it still fires by reintroducing the original `PrPanel` defect (outer component stops destructuring `taskColumnFlags`) — it reports `PrPanel declares taskColumnFlags but never takes it`. Dashboard app suite: **113 files / 3921 tests** (was 3922 — the deleted case is the difference). ## The gate started catching defects as they landed Syncing with main brought in three fresh conversions from other workers. The hardened check flagged all three immediately — the first time these guards have fired on someone else's landed code rather than on my own. - **`TaskCard`** — `getRunningOptionalGateBadge(task)` omitted flags while *both* `ListView` sites supplied. Fixed, and `taskColumnFlags` added to the `useMemo` deps: no `exhaustive-deps` rule here, so a memo that reads flags without listing them keeps the first-paint `undefined` answer and reproduces the bug through staleness instead of omission. - **`TaskTokenStatsPanel`** — `getTotalAgentActiveMs` omitted while `TaskCard` supplied, so the same runtime number came from the real column on a card and from legacy ids in the detail modal. Now takes `columnFlags`, supplied from `detailColumnFlags` — correct here because the panel renders the modal's **own** task, unlike the near-duplicate canonical above. - **`ListView` ×2** — passed `columnFlagsById.get(task.column)`, the cross-workflow **union**. A task whose own workflow doesn't declare that column gets a *neighbour workflow's* traits. The landed comment justified it as "this list already owns `columnFlagsById`" — exactly the reasoning `column-role-degraded-flags.test.ts` exists to reject. It failed on merge and is how I found this. Also: the `getTotalAgentActiveMs` exemption I was carrying **self-retired**. Main wired the seam, the staleness check failed the entry, and I removed it. That mechanism has now paid for itself once. ### Pre-existing, NOT from this PR: `App.test.tsx` is red on main `app/components/__tests__/App.test.tsx` fails **10 of 141** identically with my changes, with my changes stashed, and with main's own `App.tsx` restored. Not mine, and not in the merge gate. **Bisected on clean `main` checkouts, so this is measured rather than inferred:** | commit | date | result | |---|---|---| | `main~400` (`41d60f0355`) | 2026-07-25 | **140 passed** (140 tests) | | `main~275` (`74d6513fae`) | 2026-07-27 | 3 failed / 141 | | `main~210` (`d2ce1ba8b5`) | 2026-07-29 | 10 failed / 141 | | `main` (`6fc98fd6c7`) | 2026-07-30 | 10 failed / 141 | So it is **not one regression** — it degraded in two stages across 2026-07-25 → 07-29, and the test file itself changed in that window (140 → 141 tests). Three commits touched it there: `73b2a32e2b`, `f26cbedf4f`, `f157bf7460`. That window overlaps the workflow-owned lifecycle migration, which is suggestive but not something I confirmed. The failures are render-level, not assertion-level — `Unable to find an element with the text: + New Task`, `Unable to find role="dialog"`, `Unable to find ... Back nav task`. The board appears to render nothing. That reads like a real regression or a harness mismatch after the lifecycle migration, not a flake, so I have deliberately **not** quarantined it — quarantine is for flakes, and using it here would hide the signal. Flagging for whoever owns `App.tsx`. My suites: `app/__tests__` **113 files / 3921 tests** green, `tsc` 0, lint 0, census `--strict` 0, seam gate 0. --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
99b79e456b |
FN-8066: show reverted badges for completed tasks
Persist git-revert provenance and display it on completed task cards. - Stamp source tasks after clean or already-reverted git outcomes. - Render localized Reverted badges in completed and archived task views. - Cover metadata, route, and card behavior with regression tests. Files changed: .changeset/fn-8066-reverted-badge.md | 7 +++ docs/dashboard-guide.md | 2 + packages/dashboard/app/components/TaskCard.css | 14 ++++- packages/dashboard/app/components/TaskCard.tsx | 20 ++++++- .../app/components/__tests__/TaskCard.test.tsx | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++ .../app/utils/__tests__/taskRevert.test.ts | 17 ++++++ packages/dashboard/app/utils/taskRevert.ts | 11 ++++ .../src/__tests__/task-revert-route.test.ts | 35 +++++++++++ .../src/routes/register-task-workflow-routes.ts | 30 ++++++++++ packages/i18n/locales/en/app.json | 2 + packages/i18n/locales/es/app.json | 2 + packages/i18n/locales/fr/app.json | 2 + packages/i18n/locales/ko/app.json | 2 + packages/i18n/locales/zh-CN/app.json | 2 + packages/i18n/locales/zh-TW/app.json | 2 + packages/i18n/src/resources.d.ts | 2 + 16 files changed, 213 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Fusion-Task-Id: FN-8066 Fusion-Task-Lineage: 2a071c14-7e5d-4161-ab0c-158f47ad9c22 Co-authored-by: Fusion (runfusion.ai) <noreply@runfusion.ai> |
||
|
|
986e249bc1 |
FN-7555: surface bidirectional undo/source task links in dashboard UI
Adds a client-side helper and UI affordances so AI-undo tasks and their source tasks link to each other in the dashboard, without any new API or backend changes. - Add packages/dashboard/app/utils/taskRevert.ts with getRevertOfId() (resolves the revertOf marker written by createAiUndoTask, with a defensive sourceType==="recovery" fallback to sourceParentTaskId) and findOpenUndoTaskForSource() (reverse lookup for the most recent open undo task pointing at a source task) - TaskCard and TaskDetailModal now render "Undo of <id>" / "Undo task: <id>" provenance links using the shared helper, keeping forward and reverse affordances consistent - Add TaskCard.css styling for the new undo-link affordance - Add/extend tests: TaskCard.test.tsx and TaskDetailModal.rendering.test.tsx cover the new undo/source link rendering - Update docs/task-management.md and packages/i18n/locales/en/app.json for the new UI copy Files changed: docs/task-management.md | 2 +- packages/dashboard/app/components/TaskCard.css | 37 +++++ packages/dashboard/app/components/TaskCard.tsx | 29 +++- .../dashboard/app/components/TaskDetailModal.tsx | 46 ++++++ .../app/components/__tests__/TaskCard.test.tsx | 46 ++++++ .../__tests__/TaskDetailModal.rendering.test.tsx | 160 +++++++++++++++++++++ packages/dashboard/app/utils/taskRevert.ts | 80 +++++++++++ packages/i18n/locales/en/app.json | 7 +- 8 files changed, 403 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Fusion-Task-Id: FN-7555 Fusion-Task-Lineage: c3d2dbd2-4d86-40b5-afce-0ca7a6dfc73d Co-authored-by: Fusion (runfusion.ai) <noreply@runfusion.ai> |