dfbab18fd5e2a9530c3af335ccd002d30dbcf8a7
8 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
bb3bdab999 |
The ratchet follows the count down — a drop tightens instead of reddening the gate (coordinator item 2) (#2679)
Taken after asking twice for reassignment with no reply, and after the same failure bit a **third** time. No open PR touches the census CLI, so this is unowned in practice — **U12, say so if you have started and I will close this in favour of yours.** ## What changed A **drop** now tightens the baseline instead of failing. Failing hard was defensible in isolation — a stale allowance is a hole, since those guards can return up to the old count while the check stays green. What it missed: **The drop is almost never the failing author's to fix.** Eleven files dropped during one merge wave, none of those PRs re-recorded, and none of their authors did anything wrong. Measured three times since CI began gating this: `columnRoles.ts` 0 → 1, then `executor.ts` twice. A permanently-red gate is a bigger hole than a stale allowance, because it gets ignored and then nothing is guarded at all. **The rise check — the ratchet's actual purpose — is untouched and still fails hard.** ## The residual, named rather than glossed In CI the write is discarded with the runner, so the committed baseline stays stale until someone commits a tightened one. The exposure is bounded (regrowth only up to the old count), printed on every run, and strictly smaller than the exposure from a check people route around. `--strict --exact` restores hard failure for the pinned end state. **One writer:** the write is now a named `writeBaseline()` shared by the tighten path and `--update-baseline`, rather than a second `writeFileSync`. Two writers for one artifact is how they drift — a lesson this file already learned once. ## Exercised end to end | scenario | result | |---|---| | drop, `--strict` | exit **0**, `TIGHTENED`, allowance rewritten 9 → 6 | | drop, `--strict --exact` | exit **1**, baseline untouched | | rise, `--strict` | exit **1** | | clean | exit **0** | Pinned through the real CLI with an isolated baseline. Revert proof: restoring the hard failure fails **1 of 32**. ## Two of my own mistakes, recorded **A vacuous assertion, in the case that guards against vacuity.** I first wrote `expect(allowedAfter).toBeLessThan(4 + allowedAfter)` — true for every number. Replaced with a comparison against the inflated value the fixture started from. This file documents that trap repeatedly and I still walked into it, which is the argument for the mechanical revert check over careful reading. **The env override is `FUSION_CENSUS_BASELINE_PATH`**, not the `FUSION_CENSUS_BASELINE` I used in the first draft — so the first version of these cases silently ran against the **real** baseline and passed for the wrong reason. A test whose fixture never took effect is the same failure as a test whose fixture can't fail. ## Verification 32/32 census suites, `pnpm test:gate` **71/71**, `--strict` exits 0, `pnpm lint` clean, `docs/testing.md` updated. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --- ## Update — the base-ref ratchet (review round 2, commit `4895845579`) The first version of this PR shipped a **named residual**: the tightening write dies with the CI runner, so the committed allowance stays high and a later PR can regrow guards up to it while `--strict` prints green. I called the exposure bounded and moved on. Greptile flagged it P1 and was right — naming a hole is not closing one. `--strict` now stops trusting the committed number for files the branch touched. It measures each **changed** file at the base commit (`FUSION_CENSUS_BASE_REF`, else the PR base branch, else `origin/main`) and fails if the file carries more guards than the base ref has. **The enforced ceiling is what main has today**, so a stale, missing, or long-unrecorded baseline no longer opens a window. | decision | why | |---|---| | changed files only, `<ref>...HEAD` | untouched files have main's counts by construction; censusing all ~400 at the base ref is ~400 `git show` calls to re-derive numbers that cannot have moved. Three-dot also stops charging this branch for guards that landed on main after the fork. | | a new file's base allowance is **0** | "absent at the base ref" as unbounded would make a new file the cheapest place to hide a fresh guard | | fails **open** on an unresolvable ref, printing `SKIPPED` | a shallow clone cannot produce an honest comparison; a degraded run must not read as a clean one. The baseline comparison still applies. | | merged into the existing `regressions` list | one failure per file, and `--update-baseline` keeps working as the deliberate escape hatch. No new exit path. | **Revert proof, measured both ways.** With the base-ref block removed, the regrowth fixture — base commit 2 guards, HEAD 5, baseline allowing 9 — exits **0** with `TIGHTENED`, which is precisely the reported scenario. With it: exit **1**, `column-guard count ROSE`, `above its count on the base ref`, baseline left at 9. **3 of the 4** end-to-end cases go red on revert. The fourth passes without the fix by design — it is the genuine-conversion case the auto-tighten exists to keep green, and a case that reddens either way proves nothing. The end-to-end suite builds a throwaway two-commit `git init` repo under the temp dir, because this exploit is a property of the **plumbing**, not of the comparison: resolving a ref, working out the changed set, reading base source through `git show`. The comparator itself is pure with the reader injected (`findRegrowthAgainstBase`), with its own cases in `lifecycle-column-census-ast.test.ts` — including the one that would silently pass everything, looking up the wrong key in `summarize().byFile`. **Rebased onto `origin/main` @ bc782d8d92** (the branch was forked before the recent merge wave; its baseline read 746 against a tree of 722). Verification on the rebased branch: census **722** / `--strict` exit 0 · **70/70** across both census suites · `pnpm test:gate` **71/71** · `pnpm lint` clean. --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
89d084e5bd |
fix(scripts): --compare was accusing the parser of a blind spot it does not have (#2682)
## The problem
`census --compare` fails on `origin/main` — I verified it at
`bc782d8d92` and at every commit on the branch where I found it. Its
failure message reads:
> The parser has a blind spot; its count cannot be the bar until this is
closed.
That matters because the parser's count **is** the bar the program just
used to declare the closing bar met (triage 0, backlog 722). A red
cross-check asserting the instrument is untrustworthy had to be settled
in one direction or the other.
## It is settled: there is no blind spot
**Measured — 13 divergent sites, all 13 seen by the parser:**
| parser's classification | count |
|---|---|
| `deliberate` | 4 |
| `role` | 5 |
| `status` | 4 |
| **missed entirely** | **0** |
## The bug is in the check
It compared per-bucket totals and failed when the regex's `column` total
exceeded the parser's. That conflates the two things it most needs to
separate:
- the parser **missed** a site → a real hole, the failure worth having;
- the parser **classified it better** → `role`/`status`/`deliberate`
instead of `column`.
The second is the parser's entire reason for existing. So the old form
fired *more* the better the parser got, while accusing it of the one
defect it did not have. The regex is knowingly weaker at telling an
agent role from a column guard — that asymmetry is why the parser was
adopted, and the check was penalising it.
The intent was never wrong; the comment above the check already said the
contract was "a site the REGEX found and the parser missed". Only the
implementation disagreed with it.
## After
```
text classifier: {"column":728,"role":0,"status":182,"deliberate":14}
AST classifier: {"column":722,"role":5,"status":186,"deliberate":17}
parser sees every site the regex does (+131 sites the regex cannot see).
14 the regex calls a column guard, the parser classifies as {"role":5,"status":4,"deliberate":4,"definition":1}.
```
Fails only on a genuinely missed site now, printing the first ten.
Reclassifications are reported rather than failed.
## Scope
Report-only. `--compare` is not in the merge gate — the gate runs
`--strict`, which is why this stayed red and unwatched. Verified:
`--compare` exit 0, `--strict` exit 0, lint clean. No census numbers
change.
|
||
|
|
543f4a556c |
Tell an already-converted fallback literal from an unconverted guard — 19 of 19 dashboard scan hits were the former (#2677)
The batch phase is about to hand per-file guard lists to cheap workers, and the census currently cannot distinguish **"not yet converted"** from **"converted, with a documented degradation."** ## The measurement that makes this a class, not a preference A proximity scan for *"legacy literal near a role-resolved call"* — the heuristic that produced #2670 and #2672 from the engine — returned **19 hits across the dashboard and zero defects.** Every one was: ```ts if (flags) return flags.hold === true || flags.countsTowardWip === true; return column === "todo" || column === "in-progress"; // reachable only without traits ``` That literal is **correct**: it answers for callers with no resolved column metadata, which is the case `resolveLifecycleColumns` returns `undefined`-for-the-whole-struct to preserve. A worker told to "convert" it would delete the only answer available when traits are absent. ## And the difference is structural, so the parser can see it In **both** engine defects the literal sat in a **separate statement beside resolved data**, not in a fallback branch. Proximity cannot tell those apart; an AST can. `traitFallback` flags the ternary form and the **early-return** form (which is how most are actually written), and deliberately does **not** flag a fallback whose test is itself a column-*name* check — otherwise any `if/else` over column names would launder itself. ## Reported beside the backlog, not subtracted from it ``` COLUMN guards (the backlog): 746 of the column guards, 9 are trait-fallback branches (already converted) ``` A fallback literal is still a literal and should go when the trait path becomes unconditional. This only says which **kind** of work it is. **Advisory, and structurally so:** `traitFallback` never changes `kind`, and the count lives *outside* `totals`. My first attempt put it in `totals` and broke two existing suites that correctly deep-equal that shape — an advisory number does not belong in the structure that defines the bar. ## Revert proof Forcing `traitFallback: false` fails **3 of 33** (both fallback forms, plus the kind-unchanged case). The two *negative* cases pass under the revert — which is the point: they assert what must **not** be flagged, and a classifier that flags nothing satisfies them trivially. Worth stating, because a revert proof that only counts failures would look stronger than it is. ## Baseline Re-recorded: `executor.ts` 87 → 85 was **main's own drift** from #2568 landing, so `--strict` was red on main again. #2668 made the re-record possible; the auto-tighten (coordinator item 2) is still open, and this is the third time in this program that a legitimate merge has left the gate red for everyone else. ## Verification 62/62 across both census suites, `pnpm test:gate` **71/71**, `--strict` exits 0, `pnpm lint` clean. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit * **New Features** * Added reporting for legacy column comparisons found in trait-fallback branches. * Census results now include a separate count for these fallback-related column guards. * Human-readable reports display the new metric alongside the existing backlog totals. * **Tests** * Added coverage for fallback detection across ternary, early-return, and conditional patterns. * Added safeguards to prevent false positives in resolved-data and column-name checks. * **Maintenance** * Updated baseline census metrics to reflect revised classifications. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
e711fbab15 |
The ratchet's baseline could not be re-recorded once a file rose — the one state that blocks a correct conversion (#2668)
Unowned (no open PR touches the census CLI — only its baseline JSON) and **live**, since #2654 gates CI on `--strict`. ## The problem `--update-baseline` sat **behind** the rise exit, so the only supported way to re-record was unavailable in exactly the situation that needs it. That matters because **a conversion legitimately adds a literal.** The correct shape for a caller that may have no traits is `flags ? flags.x : columnId === "legacy"`, and each one raises a file's count by one. Measured on current main: `columnRoles.ts` went **0 → 1** from precisely that shape (added by #2647, documented at the site, correct code). So a worker doing the right thing meets a red gate whose only escape is hand-editing the JSON. That is how a ratchet becomes something people route around rather than run — and then it guards nothing. This is the same failure mode as a guard that cannot fire, arrived at from the other side. ## The change `--update-baseline` is an explicit operator action, so it re-records **unconditionally** and prints what it accepted under `ACCEPTED RISES`. Swallowing a rise silently is the real danger; refusing to let anyone re-record is the same danger one step later, wearing a red check nobody trusts. **The rise check is unchanged** and still exits 1 without the flag. **One writer now.** The old second `writeFileSync` behind the rise exit is deleted rather than left unreachable — two writers for one artifact is how they drift. The `!deliberateTracked && updateBaseline` special case went with it, since the unconditional block covers the legacy-shape migration too. ## Exercised end to end On a real rise injected into `live-agent-count.ts`: ``` rise + plain --strict exit 1 (the ratchet still bites) rise + --strict --update-baseline exit 0 "ACCEPTED RISES live-agent-count.ts: 6 -> 7" ``` Four cases assert the CLI's own source, because exit codes are the contract and the pure summarizer cannot express them: the write precedes the rise check, the branches exit 0 and 1 respectively, accepted rises are **named**, and there is exactly **one** writer. ## A note on the revert proof, because it caught me twice My first attempt to move the block back was a **no-op**: the marker I sliced on (`if (regressions.length > 0) {`) also appears *inside* the update block, so the "revert" reassembled the file unchanged and the suite stayed green. **A revert proof that does not go red can mean the guard is vacuous *or* that the revert did not land** — and the second is easy to miss when you are expecting the first. The real revert fails **2 of 27**, and the assertions now verify marker *uniqueness* before slicing on it. ## Verification - 27/27 census suites; `--strict` exits 0; `pnpm test:gate` **71/71**; `pnpm lint` clean - census on this tree: 748 column guards, **4 triage** (all in `moves.ts`'s flag-OFF block, deletion-scheduled with #2655) 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
a6138abeff |
U12: DELIBERATE-LITERAL counts key on file AND column — closing the P1 left on merged #2661 (#2666)
Closes the P1 that was still open when #2661 merged. ## The hole A per-file integer is offset **within a single file**: remove one reviewed `todo` exemption, add an `in-review` one beside it, and the number never moves. The fresh guard is invisible to the column counts too, because deliberate findings are excluded from them — so `--strict` goes green with a new lifecycle-column guard hiding inside an existing marker. Now keyed on **file AND column id**. **Proven with the exact scenario:** swapping a marked `triage` for `done` inside `TaskCard.tsx` leaves the per-file total unchanged and now fails with ``` packages/dashboard/app/components/TaskCard.tsx (DELIBERATE-LITERAL: done): 0 -> 1 ``` ## The pattern worth naming This is the **third** time this instrument has been defeated by an aggregate: | version | defeated by | |---|---| | repo-wide `totals.deliberate` | an addition in file A offset by a removal in file B | | per-file integer | an addition offset by a removal **in the same file** | | per-file per-column | — | Each step narrows what can offset silently, and I walked into the next one twice by fixing the *reported case* rather than the *shape*. Writing it down because the same reflex will produce a fourth if someone adds another aggregate here. **The residual is deliberate, not an oversight:** a same-file **same-column** swap still offsets. Two `todo` exemptions in one file are interchangeable by definition, so there is nothing a reviewer could act on. That is recorded at the site so the next person doesn't rediscover it as a bug. ## Migration, again The key **shape** changed (`file` → `file\0columnId`), which is the same hazard as a missing field: comparing new keys against old reports every existing marker as a fresh rise and pushes people to convert already-reviewed literals. I hit it on the first run here — `TaskCard (DELIBERATE-LITERAL: triage): 0 -> 2` — exactly as I did one shape earlier in #2661. Detected by the delimiter rather than a version field, since old keys have none, and re-seeded on the next `--update-baseline`. 15 file+column entries recorded. ## Verification `pnpm lint` clean. `pnpm test:gate` green (10 / 158 / 487 / 71). `pnpm check:lifecycle-columns` exits 0. Independent of #2655; either order merges. Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
cef1b08af3 |
U12: the census baseline follows the count down — and goes in the merge gate (#2661)
Coordinator item 2. The census had the right mechanism and no teeth. ## The gap `--strict` already fails on a rise **and** on an unrecorded drop — that logic was correct. But nothing blocking ran it, so the baseline drifted to **854 while the tree held 787**. That is **67 guards of regression that would have merged silently**: a high-water mark wearing a ratchet's name. This is the same shape as the ceilings I tightened in #2647, one level up. Worth saying plainly: I fixed the vitest ratchet's slack by hand and did not check whether the *authoritative* instrument had the same problem. It did, and by a much larger margin. ## Three changes 1. **`--strict` runs in `test:gate`.** The baseline cannot go stale again without a red gate. 2. **Baseline re-recorded: 854 → 785** across 14 files (`triage` 38 → 9). 3. The single RISE is resolved honestly rather than absorbed. ## The +3 investigation One file rose: `register-task-workflow-routes.ts` **22 → 23**. #2621 replaced one `task.column === "todo"` with `task.column === "triage" || task.column === "todo"` — a net **+1** that also reintroduced a `triage` literal, while the PR title reported *"count 0 → 0"*. Not an accusation. There was no gate for the author to check against, and a hand-counted claim in a PR title is exactly the thing that goes wrong without one. Change 1 is the fix. **The literal is justified and stays**, marked `DELIBERATE-LITERAL` rather than converted. It is the **v1-IR arm**: a v1 workflow yields no role assignments, so `resolveLifecycleColumns` returns nothing and the legacy pre-implementation ids are the only pre-WIP signal available. The `else` branch directly below already resolves intake/hold for every v2 workflow. Converting this arm would not finish anything — it would delete the only answer v1 boards have and admit `in-progress`/`in-review` cards into a rebound that clears worktree, branch and retry counters, which is the regression #2621 was fixing. ## Both directions proven | direction | probe | result | |---|---|---| | rise | add `t.column === 'in-review'` | `live-agent-count.ts: 6 -> 7`, exit 1 | | drop | convert one guard | `self-healing.ts: allows 111, tree has 110`, exit 1 | **The drop probe took three attempts to test honestly, and the first two "passed" while proving nothing:** 1. I renamed a receiver (`task.column` → `Probe`) — the classifier is **fail-closed**, so an unknown receiver is still counted and the number never moved. 2. I targeted a site in `hold-release.ts` that carries a `DELIBERATE-LITERAL` marker — not counted as a column guard at all, so removing it changed nothing. Only removing a counted comparison outright moved the number. Both false negatives came from me assuming the probe worked because the command exited the way I expected. ## On auto-rewrite vs fail-and-instruct You offered either. The script already does **fail-and-instruct**, with `--update-baseline` as the explicit re-record, and I kept it that way rather than making the test rewrite the baseline during a run. Reason: a silent downward rewrite means a conversion PR's own diff never shows the number moving, so "census before/after in the PR body" becomes unverifiable — the reviewer would have to re-derive it. Failing with the new number in the message puts it in the diff where a human sees it, and it costs one command. ## Verification `pnpm lint` clean. `pnpm test:gate` green with the census in it — `every file matches its baseline exactly` (10 / 132 / 487 / 71). Note for the fleet launch: with `--strict` gating, **every** conversion PR must now re-record the baseline in the same PR. That is the intended cost, and it makes the fleet's "baseline must shrink by exactly the converted count" rule mechanically enforced instead of a review instruction. --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
20878e9d5f |
census: count column: "<legacy>" query filters as a separate, separately-pinned instrument (backlog unchanged at 784) (#2650)
Pre-launch input for the 779-guard fleet. **The backlog number does not
move: 784 before, 784 after.** This adds a second number beside it.
## The problem it measures
A guard is not the only way a legacy column id decides behaviour:
```ts
const todo = await this.store.listTasks({ column: "todo", slim: true });
```
That is a **source query** — it selects the rows a sweep considers *at
all*. On a renamed or merged board it returns nothing, so a sweep whose
per-task predicate was correctly converted still does nothing, while
looking converted. `self-healing.ts:2849` names the pairing in prose,
and #2560 had to repair exactly that combination after a converted
predicate was left with a literal query.
The census walks comparison `BinaryExpression`s. A `PropertyAssignment`
is not one, so this class was invisible to the instrument **and to its
ratchet** — it could grow silently.
Measured: **83 query filters, 43 IR node definitions.**
I proved one live consequence earlier on #2648:
`recoverStuckMergeDeadlocks` cannot see a renamed board at all — the
renamed rows exist and none appear in its three-literal union
(`renamedInsideUnion=0`, on a live PG store).
## Why this matters *before* the fleet is briefed
The fleet rule is *"the baseline ratchet must shrink by exactly the
converted count."* In `self-healing.ts` — the largest batch at 111 —
both classes sit in the same functions, so today a worker either:
- converts only the comparisons → arithmetic is clean, and sweeps whose
source query still filters a dead literal stay blind; or
- converts the query too → the count does **not** move by the converted
amount, and a more-correct PR looks like a miscount.
The second punishes the better worker. With a second pinned number,
converting a query becomes visible work instead of an apparent error.
## Counted separately, deliberately
`totals.column` is a published shape — the baseline, the reporter, and
other workers' in-flight PRs read it, and the completion bar is defined
against it. Growing it would move a number the program is actively
driving to zero.
So the new counts live in `summary.properties` / `queryByFile`, under
their own baseline keys, with their own both-directions ratchet (same
rule as #2633's, including the stale-allowance half). `totals` keeps its
**exact** shape — two existing tests assert it with `toEqual`, and
breaking a contract others depend on mid-flight to add a number is not
worth it.
## Definitions are not queries
Workflow IR graph nodes carry `column:` to declare where a node lives —
`{ id: "review", kind: "...", column: "in-review" }`. That is the
lineage describing itself: not a lookup, not convertible, and ~43 of the
raw matches. They are told apart **structurally** (an `id`/`kind`
sibling in the same object literal), not by filename, so a definition
written anywhere classifies the same way.
## Baseline seeding, stated plainly
`--update-baseline` could not pin a **new** category: the regression
check runs before the write, and with no prior key every file reads as a
rise. I seeded the three new keys once, directly, leaving every guard
field byte-identical. The diff is purely additive — no removals.
## Finding, not caused by this change
**`--strict` is already red on clean main**:
`register-task-workflow-routes.ts` is **23** against a baseline of
**22**. Verified by stashing this branch and re-running on an unmodified
tree. Until that is reconciled the guard ratchet is passing nothing —
worth fixing before the fleet starts relying on it as the work order.
## Verification
- census suites **44 green**, 6 new cases: counted; kept out of the
backlog; definition-not-query; both instruments independent (a bug
routing comparisons into the query bucket would otherwise look clean on
both); `DELIBERATE-LITERAL` honoured; non-legacy id ignored
- `node scripts/lifecycle-column-census.mjs` → backlog still 784
- `pnpm lint` exit 0, `pnpm test:gate` exit 0 (695)
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
|
8e211d1870 |
TAKING scripts/: parse instead of grep — an AST classifier for the lifecycle-column bar, cross-checked by a second implementation (#2633)
The program's completion bar is "`column === "triage"` reaches zero".
This measures what that bar actually covers, and checks the measurement
in so it cannot drift.
## The number, measured by the checked-in tool
```
lifecycle-column-census: scanned 1956 source files
COLUMN guards (the backlog): 1031
ROLE comparisons (not guards): 10
DELIBERATE-LITERAL (reviewed): 4
by column id:
313 done
217 in-review
201 in-progress
177 archived
83 todo
40 triage
top files:
151 packages/engine/src/executor.ts
136 packages/engine/src/self-healing.ts
50 packages/dashboard/app/components/TaskCard.tsx
44 packages/core/src/task-store/moves.ts
34 packages/dashboard/app/components/TaskDetailModal.tsx
```
**`triage` is under 4% of the class.** Every one of those 1031 sites is
the same defect: a lifecycle decision made by column NAME, which stops
matching the moment a board renames a column. The bar can be met in full
while 991 identical guards remain — and two files hold a quarter of
them.
## The tracked count is wrong in three directions at once
Each of these cost real work this week, which is why this is a PR and
not a comment.
1. **Vocabulary.** It measures one of six legacy ids.
2. **Receiver.** It is anchored on locals named
`column`/`toColumn`/`fromColumn`, so it never saw the three real guards
in `executor.ts` written against `from` and `originColumn`. One of those
meant completed-but-stranded work was never recovered on a renamed
board, with nothing else owning that state (converted in #2628).
3. **Collision.** `role === "triage"`, `agentType === "triage"`,
`entry.agent === "triage"` compare an **AGENT ROLE**. The planner *lane*
is named `triage` and keeps that name — U11 removed the *column*. Ten
such sites were counted as backlog, and the "obvious" fix (renaming the
role) silently empties the planner's prompt template and mis-binds its
model markers.
A count that is too high and too low simultaneously sends work to the
wrong files while hiding the files that need it. So the census reports
**three separate numbers** and never nets them.
## Proven to fail on the original defect
Not asserted — exercised:
```
$ # reintroduce `task.column === "triage" || task.column === "todo"` into live-agent-count.ts
$ node scripts/lifecycle-column-census.mjs --strict; echo "exit=$?"
packages/core/src/live-agent-count.ts: 10 -> 12
exit=1
$ # restore the file
$ node scripts/lifecycle-column-census.mjs --strict >/dev/null; echo "exit=$?"
exit=0
```
The CLI also exits 1 when its own file list comes back empty — a guard
that reports success without checking anything is worse than no guard.
## 12 regression cases, split by what they defend
Must catch: all six ids; a guard on a local named `from`/`originColumn`
(verbatim the executor.ts shape); single quotes; negation; several
comparisons on one line.
Must **not** catch: role comparisons; comment prose (two tracked
"guards" in `replan-target.ts` were prose about a filter that lives in
another file); a trailing `// … === "triage"` on a code line; sites
carrying a `DELIBERATE-LITERAL` marker.
Plus: **one marker cannot launder a distant guard in the same file** —
that is how allowlists rot.
## Report-only, deliberately
`--strict` compares per-file counts against
`scripts/lib/lifecycle-column-census-baseline.json` and fails when any
file's count **rises**. It is **not** wired into the merge gate: a
thousand-site backlog cannot be a blocking check the day it is first
measured, and a guard nobody can pass is a guard everyone disables.
Owners tightening their own area re-record the baseline in the PR that
lowers it. This is the ratchet shape the `DELIBERATE-LITERAL` markers
scattered through the program already anticipate.
## Stated limitation
Classification is by receiver **name**, so a future field named `agent`
that holds a column would be misclassified as a role comparison.
Recorded at the site, and it is precisely why the two classes are
reported separately instead of netted into one figure.
## Verification
- 12/12 new cases
(`packages/engine/src/__tests__/lifecycle-column-census.test.ts`)
- `pnpm test:gate` **71/71**; `pnpm lint` clean
- `pnpm census:lifecycle-columns`, `--json`, and `--strict` all
exercised end to end
- documented in `docs/testing.md`; no production code touched
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|