Named remediation parks an unactionable review rejection as `awaiting-approval`
with `paused: true` — deliberately, because there is no actionable finding to
derive work from, so a human must decide. S07's recovery driver only re-drove the
graph, and a drive cannot move a paused card, so the declared recovery could never
reach a merge and the scenario read as a wedge.
The recovery now performs the operator's half of its own contract ("operator
retry, or the cause disappears") before driving: it releases an EXPLICIT
awaiting-approval park and then approves through the restored graph session. The
merge that follows is still fully asserted, so this widens no assertion.
builtin:coding-ideas-v2 covers 18 of 19 scenarios plus the multi-repository
workspace drive. Three consecutive full runs: 123.6s, 125.7s, 126.1s of 150s.
S05 stays on its original workflows. It passes 22/22 when its file runs alone but
fails intermittently under full-lane load, and settling in-flight merges at every
graph dispatch — before and after, with a 10x larger drain bound — did not remove
it. That points at cross-file interference rather than the merge race it first
resembled, and an unexplained flake is not something to ship.
19c3981a50