Files
fusion/packages/engine/src/pr-comment-handler.ts
gsxdsm d5f1ce7abd U11 [writes]: stop CREATING cards into a column the workflow no longer declares (9 -> 0, engine+cli) (#2603)
**Taking: `engine/triage.ts`, `engine/pr-comment-handler.ts`,
`engine/eval-followups.ts`, `cli/commands/task.ts`, `cli/extension.ts`**
(write class — no collision with the comparison backlog).

## A class the census does not count

The 48-guard work list tracks `=== "triage"` **comparisons**. These are
`column: "triage"` **writes** — and post-#2515 every one creates a card
directly into the state STALL 3 was about, except **manufactured
continuously** rather than left behind by the upgrade.

## Why they bite

`createTaskImpl` resolves the column as:

```ts
column: input.column || options?.resolvedEntryColumn || fallbackIntakeColumn || "triage"
```

`input.column` **wins**, so an explicit `column: "triage"` overrides the
workflow's resolved intake column entirely.
`store-create-intake-column.test.ts` already pins that a create with
**no** column lands in the default workflow's intake (now `todo`) —
these callers opted out of it.

The sharpest is `triage.ts`'s `fn_task_create` agent tool: it passed
`workflowId: params.workflow_id` **and** `column: "triage"` in the same
call. The caller chose a workflow and the column ignored it — a Coding
(Ideas) create landed in `triage` instead of `ideas`.

## Counts

**Comparison guards: unchanged by this PR.** This is the write class;
conflating the two would misreport convergence toward the zero bar.

| file | `column: "triage"` writes before | after |
|---|---:|---:|
| `packages/engine/src/triage.ts` | 1 | **0** |
| `packages/engine/src/pr-comment-handler.ts` | 1 | **0** |
| `packages/engine/src/eval-followups.ts` | 1 | **0** |
| `packages/cli/src/commands/task.ts` | 3 | **0** |
| `packages/cli/src/extension.ts` | 3 | **0** |
| **total** | **9** | **0** |

## A test that pinned the defect

`pr-comment-handler.test.ts` asserted `column: "triage"` in the
createTask call — so it would have **failed the fix and passed the
bug**. Rewritten to assert the invariant (the caller passes no column,
so the workflow's intake wins) plus an explicit `Object.hasOwn(arg,
"column") === false`, which is what actually catches a reintroduction.

## Interaction with #2591

My merged #2591 rescues these cards once created — they sit on a legacy
planner id their workflow doesn't declare and are still in planning
stage. So this isn't a *visible* stall today; the rescue absorbs it.
**That's the reason to fix it rather than leave it:** a self-healing
path silently absorbing a steady stream of malformed creates is exactly
how the underlying defect stays invisible.

## Deliberately not touched

- `{ id: "start", kind: "start", column: "triage" }` in the builtin
coding / PR / lead-generation IRs — workflow-internal **node
declarations** for workflows that still legitimately declare a `triage`
column, not lifecycle writes.
- Left for their owners: `core/task-store/project-store-ops.ts:210`,
`core/task-store/update-task-deps.ts:111` (main worker),
`dashboard/src/routes/register-gitlab.ts:108` (u12). Same defect, same
one-line shape.

## Verification

- 304 engine/CLI tests green across the affected suites
- merge gate green (482 + 132 + 10), engine + CLI tsc clean, lint clean

No changeset: `@fusion/engine` and `@fusion/core` are private; the CLI
change is a bug fix with no user-facing API change — happy to add one if
you'd rather it appear in release notes.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
2026-07-29 20:58:52 -07:00

347 lines
11 KiB
TypeScript

import type { TaskStore } from "@fusion/core";
import type { PrInfo } from "@fusion/core";
import { prMonitorLog } from "./logger.js";
/*
FNXC:PullRequestReview 2026-07-26-00:00:
The PR-feedback follow-up card is a real product feature, but it used to borrow the shared automated-recovery follow-up engine (`createAutomatedFollowup` in verification-followup-dedup.ts) purely for its dedup pass. That engine was deleted along with the recovery follow-up cards it existed to file, so the one dedup rule this feature needs is inlined below: never file a second card for the same PR number under the same parent while one is still open. Closed columns (done/archived) are excluded so a later close/reopen of the same PR can legitimately file a fresh card.
*/
const CLOSED_FOLLOWUP_COLUMNS = new Set(["done", "archived"]);
interface PrComment {
id: number;
body: string;
user: { login: string };
created_at: string;
updated_at: string;
html_url: string;
}
/**
* Analyzes PR comments for actionable feedback and creates
* steering comments or follow-up tasks.
*/
export class PrCommentHandler {
// Keywords that suggest actionable feedback
private readonly ACTION_KEYWORDS = [
"fix",
"change",
"update",
"remove",
"add",
"should",
"need to",
"needs to",
"please",
"consider",
"suggest",
"recommend",
];
// Non-actionable patterns to filter out
private readonly NON_ACTIONABLE_PATTERNS = [
/^\s*lgtm\s*$/i,
/^\s*looks? good\s*$/i,
/^\s*thanks?\s*$/i,
/^\s*thank you\s*$/i,
/^\s*nice\s*$/i,
/^\s*great\s*$/i,
/^\s*awesome\s*$/i,
/^\s*👍\s*$/,
/^\s*✅\s*$/,
];
constructor(private store: TaskStore) {}
/**
* Process new PR comments for a task.
* Called by PrMonitor when new comments are detected.
*/
async handleNewComments(
taskId: string,
prInfo: PrInfo,
comments: PrComment[]
): Promise<void> {
for (const comment of comments) {
await this.processComment(taskId, prInfo, comment);
}
}
private async processComment(
taskId: string,
prInfo: PrInfo,
comment: PrComment
): Promise<void> {
// Skip non-actionable comments
if (this.isNonActionable(comment.body)) {
prMonitorLog.log(`Skipping non-actionable comment #${comment.id}`);
return;
}
// Check if comment contains actionable feedback
const isActionable = this.isActionable(comment.body);
const hasCodeSuggestions = this.hasCodeBlock(comment.body);
if (!isActionable && !hasCodeSuggestions) {
prMonitorLog.log(`Comment #${comment.id} does not contain actionable feedback`);
return;
}
// Build comment text
const text = this.buildCommentText(prInfo, comment, hasCodeSuggestions);
try {
await this.store.addTaskComment(taskId, text, "agent");
await this.upsertReviewItem(taskId, prInfo, comment, "queued");
prMonitorLog.log(`Added comment for PR review #${comment.id}`);
} catch (err) {
prMonitorLog.error(`Failed to add comment for ${taskId}:`, err);
}
}
/**
* Check if a comment is non-actionable (LGTM, thanks, etc.)
*/
private isNonActionable(body: string): boolean {
const trimmed = body.trim();
return this.NON_ACTIONABLE_PATTERNS.some((pattern) => pattern.test(trimmed));
}
/**
* Check if a comment contains actionable feedback keywords.
*/
private isActionable(body: string): boolean {
const lowerBody = body.toLowerCase();
return this.ACTION_KEYWORDS.some((keyword) => lowerBody.includes(keyword));
}
/**
* Check if a comment contains code blocks suggesting changes.
*/
private hasCodeBlock(body: string): boolean {
// Look for code blocks (``` or `code`)
return /```[\s\S]*?```/.test(body) || /`[^`]+`/.test(body);
}
/**
* Build comment text from PR review comment.
*/
private buildCommentText(
prInfo: PrInfo,
comment: PrComment,
hasCodeSuggestions: boolean
): string {
const lines: string[] = [];
lines.push(`**PR Review Feedback** from @${comment.user.login}`);
lines.push(`**PR:** #${prInfo.number} (${prInfo.status})`);
if (prInfo.status !== "open") {
lines.push(`**Note:** This PR is already ${prInfo.status}. Treat the feedback as follow-up work.`);
}
lines.push("");
// Truncate comment body if too long
const maxBodyLength = 500;
let body = comment.body.trim();
if (body.length > maxBodyLength) {
body = body.slice(0, maxBodyLength) + "...";
}
lines.push(body);
lines.push("");
if (hasCodeSuggestions) {
lines.push("💡 This comment contains code suggestions. Please review and apply if appropriate.");
}
lines.push(`[View on GitHub](${comment.html_url})`);
return lines.join("\n");
}
/**
* Handle "changes requested" PR review state.
* Moves the task back to in-progress with reviewer feedback as a steering comment,
* closing the feedback loop so the agent can address the requested changes.
*/
async handleChangesRequested(
taskId: string,
prInfo: PrInfo,
reviewerLogin: string,
reviewBody: string,
): Promise<void> {
try {
const task = await this.store.getTask(taskId);
if (task.column !== "in-review") {
prMonitorLog.log(`Task ${taskId} not in-review (${task.column}), skipping changes-requested handling`);
return;
}
// Add reviewer feedback as a steering comment
const feedbackText = [
`**Changes Requested** by @${reviewerLogin} on PR #${prInfo.number}`,
"",
reviewBody ? reviewBody.slice(0, 800) : "(no review body)",
"",
"Please address the requested changes and update the PR.",
].join("\n");
await this.store.addTaskComment(taskId, feedbackText, "agent");
await this.upsertReviewItem(
taskId,
prInfo,
{
id: Date.now(),
body: reviewBody || "(no review body)",
user: { login: reviewerLogin },
created_at: new Date().toISOString(),
updated_at: new Date().toISOString(),
html_url: prInfo.url,
},
"queued",
);
await this.store.moveTask(taskId, "in-progress");
await this.store.logEntry(
taskId,
`PR #${prInfo.number}: changes requested by @${reviewerLogin} — moved back to in-progress`,
);
prMonitorLog.log(`Task ${taskId} moved to in-progress after changes requested on PR #${prInfo.number}`);
} catch (err) {
prMonitorLog.error(`Failed to handle changes-requested for ${taskId}:`, err);
}
}
/**
* Create a follow-up task when a PR is closed with unaddressed feedback.
* This is called when a PR is merged or closed.
*/
async createFollowUpTask(
originalTaskId: string,
prInfo: PrInfo,
unaddressedComments: PrComment[]
): Promise<void> {
if (unaddressedComments.length === 0) return;
const summary = unaddressedComments
.map((c) => `- @${c.user.login}: ${c.body.slice(0, 100).trim()}${c.body.length > 100 ? "..." : ""}`)
.join("\n");
const description = `Follow-up for ${originalTaskId}
PR #${prInfo.number} was ${prInfo.status} with unaddressed feedback:
${summary}
Please review the PR comments and address any remaining issues.`;
try {
const openTasks = await this.store.listTasks({ slim: true }).catch(() => []);
const existing = openTasks.find(
(task) =>
task.id !== originalTaskId &&
!CLOSED_FOLLOWUP_COLUMNS.has(task.column) &&
task.sourceParentTaskId === originalTaskId &&
task.sourceMetadata?.prNumber === prInfo.number,
);
if (existing) {
prMonitorLog.log(`Reused follow-up task ${existing.id} for PR #${prInfo.number}`);
return;
}
const task = await this.store.createTask({
title: `Follow-up: Address PR #${prInfo.number} feedback`,
description,
/* FNXC:WorkflowLifecycleColumns 2026-07-29-20:15 (U11): no explicit column —
`createTaskImpl` resolves the WORKFLOW'S intake column, and `input.column` would
override it. Hard-coding `"triage"` created the card in a column the default
lineage no longer declares (#2515), i.e. straight into the stranded state. */
dependencies: [originalTaskId],
source: {
sourceType: "api",
sourceParentTaskId: originalTaskId,
sourceMetadata: { prNumber: prInfo.number, prUrl: prInfo.url },
},
});
prMonitorLog.log(`Created follow-up task ${task.id} for PR #${prInfo.number}`);
} catch (err) {
prMonitorLog.error(`Failed to create follow-up task:`, err);
}
}
private async upsertReviewItem(
taskId: string,
prInfo: PrInfo,
comment: PrComment,
status: "queued" | "in-progress" | "addressed" | "failed",
): Promise<void> {
const task = await this.store.getTask(taskId);
const now = new Date().toISOString();
const current = task.review ?? {
mode: "pull-request",
source: "github-pr",
decision: "pending",
items: [],
selectedItemIds: [],
};
const itemId = `gh-comment-${comment.id}`;
const existingIndex = current.items.findIndex((item: { id: string }) => item.id === itemId);
const nextItem = {
id: itemId,
source: "github-pr" as const,
status,
summary: comment.body.trim().slice(0, 160) || `Feedback from @${comment.user.login}`,
body: comment.body,
reviewer: comment.user.login,
commentUrl: comment.html_url,
createdAt: comment.created_at,
updatedAt: now,
};
const nextItems = [...current.items];
if (existingIndex >= 0) {
nextItems[existingIndex] = { ...nextItems[existingIndex], ...nextItem };
} else {
nextItems.push(nextItem);
}
const currentReviewState = task.reviewState ?? {
source: "pull-request" as const,
items: [],
addressing: [],
};
const existingReviewStateIndex = currentReviewState.items.findIndex((item) => item.id === itemId);
const nextReviewStateItem = {
id: itemId,
githubCommentId: comment.id,
body: comment.body,
author: { login: comment.user.login },
createdAt: comment.created_at,
updatedAt: now,
htmlUrl: comment.html_url,
source: "github-pr" as const,
};
const nextReviewStateItems = [...currentReviewState.items];
if (existingReviewStateIndex >= 0) {
nextReviewStateItems[existingReviewStateIndex] = { ...nextReviewStateItems[existingReviewStateIndex], ...nextReviewStateItem };
} else {
nextReviewStateItems.push(nextReviewStateItem);
}
await this.store.updateTask(taskId, {
review: {
...current,
mode: "pull-request",
source: "github-pr",
summary: `PR #${prInfo.number} feedback items: ${nextItems.length}`,
latestRefreshAt: now,
items: nextItems,
},
reviewState: {
...currentReviewState,
source: "pull-request",
summary: currentReviewState.summary,
items: nextReviewStateItems,
},
});
}
}