Files
fusion/docs/solutions/architecture-patterns
gsxdsm 9dbc98f1b3 Audit: every sync workflow-IR read answers for the DEFAULT workflow (not a PG-only problem) (#2653)
Docs only. This came out of a #2593 review thread that reported the
problem as PostgreSQL-specific. **It is unconditional**, and it has
consequences well outside the guard I was fixing — including one that
looks like a live production break for custom workflows.

## The chain, each link checkable

1. `TaskStore.getTaskWorkflowSelection(taskId)` delegates straight to
`getTaskWorkflowSelectionImpl` — **no mode branch** (`store.ts:2545`).
2. `getTaskWorkflowSelectionImpl` **returns `undefined`
unconditionally** (`workflow-definitions.ts:505-512`). Its own comment:
*"sync selection reader is incomplete-PG; use
getTaskWorkflowSelectionAsync."* A PG-cutover stub that never got
finished.
3. So `resolveTaskWorkflowIrSyncImpl` always takes its `if
(!workflowId)` branch and returns `resolveDefaultWorkflowIr()`. Its
`isBuiltinWorkflowId` and `SELECT ir FROM workflows` branches are
**unreachable in production**.

`resolveTaskWorkflowIrSync` is typed `WorkflowIr`, non-optional — so
callers cannot detect the substitution. There is no `undefined` to check
and the IR that arrives looks valid.

**Why tests don't catch it:** test stores stub
`getTaskWorkflowSelection` with a real selection, so the reader works
under test and substitutes only in production. Any test written against
a stubbed store proves the caller's logic and never the reader's
behavior.

## Consequences, severity descending

1. **Custom fields appear to be rejected on custom workflows.**
`resolveTaskCustomFieldDefsSyncImpl` returns `ir.fields` — the DEFAULT
workflow's. `task-update.ts:128-136` validates against them, and its own
comment states the outcome: *"a write against a workflow with no fields
(the default) is rejected with a typed CustomFieldRejectionError."*
2. **Per-workflow capacity pools collapse** —
`resolveEffectiveWorkflowIdSyncImpl` reads the same selection, so every
task resolves to `resolveCapacityPoolId(undefined)`.
3. **Plugin transition hooks re-run against the wrong IR**
(`lifecycle-ops.ts:1052`, crash recovery).
4. **Terminal-node detection degrades** to `nodeId === "end"`
(`branch-and-pr-entities.ts:578`).
5. **A U7 guard was inert** — fixed in #2593. Its fail-closed arm was
`workflowIr ? … : true`, dead code against a non-optional return.

**#1 and #2 are REASONED FROM SOURCE, NOT OBSERVED.** I did not execute
those paths, and I am labelling them that way in the doc rather than
reporting them as confirmed. No test in `packages/core` covers
`CustomFieldRejectionError` or `resolveTaskCustomFieldDefsSync` —
consistent with the gap, but absence of a test is not proof of a break.
**Reproduce before fixing.** I would rather hand you a labelled
hypothesis than a confident claim I did not verify.

## Why this matters for the fleet, specifically

The census work replaces column literals with trait lookups. A
conversion that resolves its traits through a **sync** reader produces a
guard that reads the DEFAULT workflow's traits for every task —
plausible, wrong, and invisible. **It converts a visible literal into a
hidden bug**, and the ratchet counts it as progress.

Suggested addition to the fleet brief: conversions must resolve through
`resolveWorkflowIrForTaskWithProvenance` and branch on `source`;
`resolveTaskWorkflowIrSync` is never acceptable in a converted guard.

## Not fixed here

Each consequence needs its sync call path made async — a real slice per
site, not an end-of-turn edit. #2593 fixed only the one that was mine.
Census unchanged (781 / triage 5); this PR adds and converts no guards.

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Documentation**
* Added an architecture-pattern finding documenting a workflow-reading
limitation that can cause synchronous reads to use the default workflow.
* Described resulting effects on custom workflow updates, crash
recovery, capacity-pool handling, and terminal-node detection.
* Documented testing gaps and guidance to avoid synchronous task
workflow reads.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-30 00:37:59 -07:00
..