51934931e1
Converts the one site in `register-task-workflow-routes.ts` that a previous pass **deliberately deferred**, and does it in the shape that note asked for. ## What the deferral said ``` FNXC:WorkflowResolvedColumns 2026-07-29-00:00 (U12 — R8, DELIBERATELY NOT CONVERTED): … I converted it and then REVERTED: resolving each task's hold column needs a per-task workflow read, and this is the board-load path whose own comment above exists because unbounded reads here "turn a board load into thousands of reads". Converting it properly needs the hold column resolved per WORKFLOW from data the board payload already carries, not per task from the store. ``` That was the right call and the right diagnosis. `resolveProjectColumnsForRoles(store, ["hold"])` is exactly the project-scoped shape it names: **one** `listWorkflowDefinitions()` read per board load, flat in task count. The expensive part — a PROMPT.md read per row — is untouched and still bounded by `AWAITING_PLANNING_ENRICH_LIMIT`. The test asserts the flatness directly (`listWorkflowDefinitions` called exactly once), so a future per-task regression fails here rather than being discovered as board latency. ## What was broken The filter named `todo`, so on a board whose waiting lane is called anything else **no row was enriched at all** — no error, no log line, just a silent fall back to the client's `steps.length === 0` heuristic. That heuristic is precisely what this enrichment was added to correct, so the card most likely to be mislabelled — real spec, zero parsed steps, already a scheduler dispatch candidate — sat on "Queued to plan" indefinitely. Over-inclusion is the safe direction and is chosen deliberately: a card in some other workflow's hold lane gets annotated as waiting, which is what a waiting card in a waiting lane should show. ## Revert proof (measured) Restore `task.column === "todo"`: ``` FAIL register-task-workflow-routes.awaiting-planning.test.ts > enriches a card in a RENAMED hold lane, not only one literally named todo expected undefined to be false ``` The other 8 cases in the file stay green — their harness store declares no `listWorkflowDefinitions`, so they run the degraded legacy-`todo` path. That compatibility is half the contract, which is why the new case brings its own store rather than widening the shared harness. ## Census | file | before | after | |---|---|---| | `packages/dashboard/src/routes/register-task-workflow-routes.ts` | 3 | 2 | The 2 remaining in that file are documented trait-fallback branches, not unconverted debt. The baseline also picks up `packages/core/src/task-store/moves.ts` 2 -> 0, already true on main and not from this diff. ## Verification - `pnpm test:gate` — 161 / 487 / 13 / 71 passed - `pnpm lint` — clean - `tsc --noEmit -p tsconfig.json` (`@fusion/dashboard`) — clean - `node scripts/lifecycle-column-census.mjs --strict` — exit 0 - targeted: `register-task-workflow-routes.awaiting-planning.test.ts` 9/9 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Changeset Format Guide
Each changeset file in this directory describes one user-facing change for release notes.
Required body format
---
"@runfusion/fusion": minor
---
summary: Add a Command Center productivity control for LOC backfills.
category: feature
dev: Uses the new `fn_backfill_loc` tool; settings key `commandCenter.locBackfill`.
Fields
| Field | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
summary |
Yes | One line, user-facing, max 120 chars. Describe what changed for the operator. |
category |
Yes | One of: feature, fix, breaking, security, performance, internal. |
dev |
No | Developer or migration detail. Preserved in per-package CHANGELOGs but excluded from distilled release notes. |
Audience
The summary is the only content that appears in end-user release notes by default. Write for Fusion operators — describe behavior, fixes, and what changed. Avoid internal class names, file paths, and implementation detail.
Bump types
patch— bug fixes, internal changesminor— new features, CLI additions, toolsmajor— breaking changes
Validation
Run pnpm check:changesets to validate. The linter runs in the PR-check gate and test:gate. Legacy freeform changesets pass with a warning during the transition period.