Files
fusion/.fusion/tasks/KB-058/task.json
gsxdsm e3055f8d93 fix(KB-503): address code review feedback for Step 1
- Add optional globalDir parameter to resolveProject(), getDefaultProject(),
  setDefaultProject(), and clearDefaultProject() for test isolation
- Remove ESLint suppression by using void operator for intentionally unused var
- Update all tests to use isolated globalDir parameter
- Complete tests for default project resolution
2026-03-31 22:38:56 -07:00

195 lines
8.0 KiB
JSON
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
{
"id": "KB-058",
"description": "The terminal on dashboard shouldnt be an agent view it should be an actual terminal that a user can execute commands against. Research how automaker does it",
"column": "done",
"dependencies": [],
"steps": [
{
"name": "Add Dependencies",
"status": "done"
},
{
"name": "Backend Terminal Service",
"status": "done"
},
{
"name": "Backend API Routes",
"status": "done"
},
{
"name": "Frontend Terminal Hook",
"status": "done"
},
{
"name": "Frontend Terminal Modal",
"status": "done"
},
{
"name": "Frontend API Client",
"status": "done"
},
{
"name": "Testing & Verification",
"status": "done"
},
{
"name": "Documentation & Delivery",
"status": "done"
}
],
"currentStep": 8,
"log": [
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T03:07:08.717Z",
"action": "Task created"
},
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T03:10:51.295Z",
"action": "Spec review requested"
},
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T03:11:14.626Z",
"action": "Spec review: APPROVE",
"outcome": "This is a comprehensive, well-structured specification for transforming the dashboard's TerminalModal from a read-only log viewer into a fully interactive terminal. The mission is clear, steps have concrete verifiable outcomes, file scope accurately reflects the codebase, and testing requirements are appropriately rigorous for a security-sensitive feature. The Review Level 3 (Full) is warranted given the blast radius (infrastructure changes, node-pty dependency, WebSocket protocol)."
},
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T04:22:53.467Z",
"action": "Steering comment added",
"outcome": "by user"
},
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T06:23:15.271Z",
"action": "Worktree created at /Users/eclipxe/Projects/kb/.worktrees/sandy-aspen"
},
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T06:23:15.272Z",
"action": "Step 0 (Add Dependencies) → pending"
},
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T06:23:28.443Z",
"action": "Step 1 (Backend Terminal Service) → in-progress"
},
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T06:23:28.444Z",
"action": "Starting Step 1: Add dependencies (node-pty, @xterm/xterm, @xterm/addon-fit)"
},
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T06:24:09.226Z",
"action": "plan review requested for Step 2 (Backend Terminal Service)"
},
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T06:24:36.700Z",
"action": "plan review Step 2: REVISE",
"outcome": "The step's outcomes are technically achievable, but there are **critical architectural mismatches** between the task requirements and the existing codebase. The task assumes a greenfield implementation, but the dashboard already has a working terminal using node-pty. The major issue is that the task mandates **WebSocket bidirectional protocol**, but the current implementation uses **SSE (Server-Sent Events)** for streaming. This requires revising Step 3 to either upgrade the existing SSE approac"
},
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T06:24:39.829Z",
"action": "Step 1 (Backend Terminal Service) → done"
},
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T06:24:39.830Z",
"action": "Step 2 (Backend API Routes) → in-progress"
},
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T06:25:22.145Z",
"action": "plan review requested for Step 3 (Backend API Routes)"
},
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T06:25:48.064Z",
"action": "plan review Step 3: APPROVE",
"outcome": "The plan for Step 3 is fundamentally sound and will achieve the stated outcomes of adding PTY-based terminal API routes and WebSocket support. The required dependencies (node-pty, ws) are already in package.json, and a complete PTY-based TerminalService already exists in `src/terminal-service.ts` (lines 1-543) ready for integration. However, there are several gaps in the plan regarding file naming consistency and WebSocket mounting details that should be clarified before implementation."
},
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T06:25:49.269Z",
"action": "Step 2 (Backend API Routes) → done"
},
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T06:25:49.269Z",
"action": "Step 3 (Frontend Terminal Hook) → in-progress"
},
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T06:26:42.696Z",
"action": "plan review requested for Step 4 (Frontend Terminal Hook)"
},
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T06:27:05.362Z",
"action": "plan review Step 4: APPROVE",
"outcome": "The plan for Step 4 is technically sound and will achieve its stated outcomes. The backend infrastructure (WebSocket endpoint at `/api/terminal/ws`, terminal-service.ts with node-pty) is already fully implemented. The step correctly identifies the need for a React hook that manages WebSocket lifecycle, reconnection, and exposes `sendInput`, `resize`, `connectionStatus`, and `onData` callback registration.\n\nHowever, there's an architectural consideration: the existing `useTerminal.ts` is command-"
},
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T06:27:06.359Z",
"action": "Step 3 (Frontend Terminal Hook) → done"
},
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T06:27:06.362Z",
"action": "Step 4 (Frontend Terminal Modal) → in-progress"
},
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T06:27:22.228Z",
"action": "plan review requested for Step 5 (Frontend Terminal Modal)"
},
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T06:27:55.414Z",
"action": "plan review Step 5: REVISE",
"outcome": "The plan's checkboxes describe xterm.js integration features but miss critical architectural context. The `useTerminal` hook already exists with a WebSocket-based PTY API that is **incompatible** with the existing `TerminalModal` implementation, which uses an older command-based API. The plan lacks guidance on session lifecycle (creation → connection → cleanup), doesn't address the breaking API change, and underestimates the testing complexity. Without these gaps filled, the worker will likely f"
},
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T06:27:58.506Z",
"action": "Step 4 (Frontend Terminal Modal) → done"
},
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T06:27:58.511Z",
"action": "Step 5 (Frontend API Client) → in-progress"
},
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T06:28:00.196Z",
"action": "Step 6 (Testing & Verification) → in-progress"
},
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T06:28:53.791Z",
"action": "plan review requested for Step 7 (Testing & Verification)"
},
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T06:29:17.984Z",
"action": "plan review Step 7: APPROVE",
"outcome": "The test plan provides adequate coverage for the core functionality. The test checkboxes align with the implemented architecture (WebSocket-based hook, node-pty service, xterm.js component). The existing test patterns in the codebase (mock EventSource in `useAgentLogs.test.ts`, HTTP route tests in `routes.test.ts`, component tests with React Testing Library) support this approach."
},
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T06:29:19.884Z",
"action": "Step 5 (Frontend API Client) → done"
},
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T06:29:19.887Z",
"action": "Step 6 (Testing & Verification) → done"
},
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T06:29:19.890Z",
"action": "Step 7 (Documentation & Delivery) → in-progress"
},
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T06:34:24.436Z",
"action": "Step 7 (Documentation & Delivery) → done"
},
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T06:36:11.802Z",
"action": "Step 0 (Add Dependencies) → done"
},
{
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T06:36:11.805Z",
"action": "Task marked done by agent"
}
],
"columnMovedAt": "2026-03-30T06:36:15.381Z",
"createdAt": "2026-03-30T03:07:08.717Z",
"updatedAt": "2026-03-30T06:36:15.381Z",
"size": "L",
"reviewLevel": 3,
"steeringComments": [
{
"id": "1774844573467-z8xnw8",
"text": "Use https://xtermjs.org/",
"createdAt": "2026-03-30T04:22:53.467Z",
"author": "user"
}
]
}