8288e4a8ab
Completes the pair started in #2498. That landed the outcome; this makes the engine's reaction consume it. ## The bug `onSpecifyComplete` fired on **every** finished specification, because the seam announcing it fired unconditionally. So a card parked at the manual plan-approval gate — finalize writes `status: "awaiting-approval"` and **returns early**, before the release move — was logged as `Specified X → todo` and had a Plan Review run armed for a plan the operator had not approved. #2491 stopped the **seeder** from acting on that, defensively, at the seeder. This removes the reason it was ever asked. Both layers are deliberate and neither is redundant: - the seeder guard covers **every caller**, including self-healing's re-seed; - this one stops the engine doing work nobody asked for, and stops it telling the operator something false about their own board. `released` is the only outcome that licenses arming a run — the only one meaning the card crossed into the hold column (or was already resting there, plan-in-place) and is the graph's now. `parked` belongs to a human; `withheld` belongs to the caller's retry budget. ## The event still fires on every outcome Deliberately. Dropping the reaction for a non-release would also drop the runtime's `recordActivity()` idle signal, and a reaction that silently does not happen is harder to reason about than one that happens with an accurate payload. R5's division of labour: **the seam announces, the subscriber decides what a given outcome licenses.** ## Why there is a new extracted function `reactToSpecificationComplete` is pulled out of the inline `InProcessRuntime` callback for the same reason the continuation drain was in #2491: the callback is built inside a class whose construction attaches to the real central project registry, so no test could distinguish *"the reaction respects the outcome"* from *"the reaction ignores it"*. **Revert proof:** with the outcome gate removed from the reaction, **5 of 8 fail**. ## Two call-site decisions worth naming **`tryFinalizeExplicitDuplicateMarker` reports through a mutable ref, not a widened return type.** Its boolean answers a *different* question — "was this a duplicate marker at all?" — and 16 existing tests assert it directly. I tried the widened return first and it turned all 16 red. Expectation edits are exactly how a behavior change travels disguised as churn, so I backed it out. **This diff touches zero existing test expectations.** **A duplicate-marker redirect reports `parked`**, which is accurate: it deletes, flags, or clears the marker; it never releases the card into the hold column. ## A fixture note — third of this shape on the program My "task vanished between release and reaction" case passed `undefined`, which triggered the harness **default parameter** and silently handed the reaction a live task — making it a duplicate of the control rather than the case it claimed to be. It now passes `null`, with a comment saying why. Running tally of near-false-greens on this unit, all the same family: a fake that ignores its predicate (#2491), a stub that ignores its callback (#2498), a default parameter that swallows the interesting input (here). Each was caught by the test failing for the *wrong reason* and being read rather than fixed. ## Verification | Check | Result | |---|---| | new suite | 8/8 | | 15 triage / planning / continuation suites | 361/361, **no expectation edits** | | `tsc --noEmit` (engine) | clean | | `pnpm lint` | clean | | `pnpm test:gate` | green (307 + 10 + 71) | | `pnpm check:changesets` | clean | 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Changeset Format Guide
Each changeset file in this directory describes one user-facing change for release notes.
Required body format
---
"@runfusion/fusion": minor
---
summary: Add a Command Center productivity control for LOC backfills.
category: feature
dev: Uses the new `fn_backfill_loc` tool; settings key `commandCenter.locBackfill`.
Fields
| Field | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
summary |
Yes | One line, user-facing, max 120 chars. Describe what changed for the operator. |
category |
Yes | One of: feature, fix, breaking, security, performance, internal. |
dev |
No | Developer or migration detail. Preserved in per-package CHANGELOGs but excluded from distilled release notes. |
Audience
The summary is the only content that appears in end-user release notes by default. Write for Fusion operators — describe behavior, fixes, and what changed. Avoid internal class names, file paths, and implementation detail.
Bump types
patch— bug fixes, internal changesminor— new features, CLI additions, toolsmajor— breaking changes
Validation
Run pnpm check:changesets to validate. The linter runs in the PR-check gate and test:gate. Legacy freeform changesets pass with a warning during the transition period.