Files
fusion/packages/cli
gsxdsm 25b3c06d2d fix(plugins): compound-engineering pipelines stalled forever on a renamed board (#3022)
Closes #3020 — which I filed **instead of** fixing, on a rationale that
turned out to be wrong.

I said the plugin had no scaffolding for faking `CePipelineStore` +
`taskStore` together. It does: `_harness.ts` already builds a real
`PluginContext` over a live PostgreSQL layer. The gap was **two missing
readers on its task-store stub**, not missing infrastructure. I checked
the harness only after filing.

## The defect

`TERMINAL_COLUMNS` is `{in-review, done}`, and the reconciler advances a
pipeline only when **every** current-stage board task is in that set. On
a board whose review and completion lanes are renamed that's false for
every task, permanently:

- the pipeline never advances a stage
- it never creates its outbound task
- it sits `running` indefinitely

Nothing errors, so it reads as work that hasn't finished. Unlike the
display defects in this family (#3014, #3017), the CE flow actually
**stops**.

## Shape

The decision is extracted to an exported `isStageTerminalColumn` because
it *is* the whole decision. Left private it could only be reached
through a pipeline-state + links + board-tasks fixture, and the half
that needed proving is that a renamed board resolves to its own lanes
through this store.

It uses `resolveReviewColumns` rather than re-deriving the union — that
helper is the documented review **set** (`mergeOrchestration ∪
mergeBlocker ∪ humanReview`), so a board splitting those across a merge
lane and a human lane is covered without this site drifting from it.

## Two things my first attempt got wrong

**The fixture spelled traits in camelCase** — `{ trait: "humanReview"
}`. Trait **ids** are kebab-case (`human-review`, `merge-blocker`,
`wip`); the camelCase names are the resolved **flags**. Those columns
therefore resolved to *no roles at all*, silently, because an unknown
trait isn't an error. `complete` is spelled identically in both
vocabularies, which is exactly what made the first run look like
*"complete works, review is broken"* rather than *"the fixture is
wrong"* — I nearly went debugging the production union.

**The harness extension is additive** and inert until a test seeds it,
so all 24 existing plugin suites see the previous shape.

## Measured

| check | result |
|---|---|
| new suite | **4/4** |
| reverting to the literal-only gate | fails **exactly 2** — the
renamed-terminal case, and a board declaring a NON-terminal column named
`done` — while the legacy control and the WIP/intake negative still pass
|
| plugin suite | **24 files, 184 tests green** |
| `tsc` + all five gates | clean |

That second row is the one that matters: the `done`-without-`complete`
board is the only shape where a real resolution and a legacy fallback
disagree, so it's what separates the fix from a lucky agreement.

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-31 01:20:04 -07:00
..
2026-06-10 18:06:51 -07:00
2026-07-26 18:11:47 -07:00

Fusion

@runfusion/fusion

From rough idea to production code — automatically.

Multi-node agent orchestrator — tasks, agents, missions, git, files, and worktrees, with any model, local or cloud.

runfusion.ai → · GitHub · Docs


Fusion reel: from rough idea to production code

Install

Zero install, straight from npm:

npx runfusion.ai

Boots the dashboard. Subcommands forward through (npx runfusion.ai task list, etc). Long form: npx @runfusion/fusion dashboard.

One-line installer (macOS & Linux — auto-picks Homebrew, falls back to npm):

curl -fsSL https://runfusion.ai/install.sh | sh

Homebrew (macOS & Linux):

brew install runfusion/fusion/fusion

Fully-qualified install auto-taps and, on Homebrew 6.0+, trusts only this formula. If short-name install fails with “untrusted tap”, run brew trust --formula runfusion/fusion/fusion then brew install fusion.

npm global:

npm install -g @runfusion/fusion
fn dashboard              # or: fusion dashboard

Launch the dashboard

From a shell:

fn dashboard                 # or: fusion dashboard / npx @runfusion/fusion dashboard
fn dashboard --paused        # start with automation paused
fn dashboard --dev           # development-mode dashboard + AI engine
fn dashboard --no-engine     # web UI only, no AI engine

The dashboard gives you:

  • A live kanban board — tasks move through columns automatically as AI works on them
  • Task detail view — generated spec, step-by-step progress, reviewer verdicts, full execution log
  • Dependency-aware scheduling — declare task dependencies or let the engine infer them
  • Auto-merge — on by default; reviewed work squash-merges without you lifting a finger
  • Parallel execution — independent tasks run simultaneously in isolated git worktrees
  • Self-sustaining board — agents may spawn follow-up tasks; the board feeds itself

Your entire dev environment. On a single pane of glass.

Describe a task in plain language. A triage agent reads your project, understands context, and writes a full PROMPT.md spec — steps, file scope, acceptance criteria. Then Fusion plans, reviews, executes, and reviews again, in an isolated git worktree, with a human approval gate wherever you want one.

One board. Controlled from anywhere. Laptop, Mac mini, Linux server, cloud VM, phone — all connected.

Fusion mesh: laptop, Mac mini, Linux server, cloud VM, phone — all synced

Run an agent company

Import a team. Run it autonomously for weeks. 440+ agents across 16 companies, wired for missions, mailboxes, and inter-agent delegation.

npx companies.sh add paperclipai/companies/gstack
Fusion agent company: import a team, run it autonomously for weeks

How it works

You create a task with a rough description. A pipeline of specialized agents takes over.

Specification. A triage agent reads your codebase — file structure, existing patterns, related code — and turns your rough idea into a detailed spec. It breaks the work into discrete steps, identifies which files are in scope, writes acceptance criteria, and assigns a complexity rating that determines how aggressively the work gets reviewed.

Scheduling. Tasks declare dependencies on each other. The scheduler builds a dependency graph and starts work only when upstream tasks are done. Independent tasks run in parallel — each in its own isolated git worktree, so there are no conflicts during execution.

Execution & review. An executor agent works through the spec step by step in the worktree. At each step boundary, a separate reviewer agent, with read-only access, independently evaluates the work. The reviewer can approve (continue), request revisions (fix specific issues), or force a rethink (change the approach entirely). Review depth scales with the task's complexity rating: trivial tasks get light checks, complex tasks get thorough multi-pass review.

Merge. When execution finishes and the reviewer signs off, the task moves to In Review:

  • Direct merge (default) — automatically squash-merges the completed task branch into your current branch with a clean commit.
  • Pull request — automatically creates or links a GitHub PR, waits for reviews/checks, then merges once policy conditions are satisfied.

autoMerge controls whether Fusion performs completion automatically. If disabled, tasks stay in In Review until you finish the merge yourself. For PR-first mode, authenticate GitHub with gh auth login.

Tasks flow through: Triage → Todo → In Progress → In Review → Done.

This execution model is heavily based on Taskplane.


What makes it different

🧠 AI specification Rough idea in, detailed PROMPT.md out — steps, file scope, acceptance criteria.
🔁 Workflow gates Plan → Review → Execute → Review on every step. Block or pass automatically.
🌳 Worktree isolation Each task runs in its own branch and worktree. Parallel tasks. Zero conflicts.
⚡ Smart merge Passing every gate? Fusion squash-merges and moves on.
🛰️ Multi-node mesh Laptop, server, cloud, phone — all synced. Desktop, mobile, web.
🧩 Any model Anthropic, OpenAI, Ollama, and more.
🏢 Agent companies Import pre-built teams — 440+ agents across 16 companies.
📬 Inter-agent messaging Built-in mailbox between agents. Delegate, clarify, coordinate.
🗺️ Missions Hierarchical planning with autopilot and validation contracts.
🔓 Open source. MIT. No vendor lock-in. Run it on your own hardware.

Working from chat

Manage tasks without leaving the conversation:

"Every ten minutes, analyze the server code for logic the client hasn't implemented yet and create tasks. Tasks may spawn additional tasks, so just add enough to keep the board saturated."

"Create a Fusion task to fix the login redirect bug"

"Add a task for dark mode support, it depends on FN-003"

"What's the status of FN-042"

"Attach screenshot.png to FN-007"

"Pause FN-012 — I want to add more context first"

The Fusion extension exposes tools to create tasks, check progress, attach files, and pause or resume automation.


Standalone CLI

See STANDALONE.md for additional installation and usage options.

Optional provider: Factory AI via Droid CLI

@runfusion/fusion now ships a vendored @fusion/droid-cli extension in the published CLI bundle.

To use it:

  1. Install the droid binary and ensure it is on your PATH
  2. Authenticate with Droid CLI (droid auth login)
  3. In Fusion dashboard, go to Settings → Authentication and enable Factory AI — via Droid CLI
  4. Restart Fusion when prompted so the extension is loaded into the runtime

Once enabled, droid-cli models appear in Fusion model selection.

Maintainer note: workspace plugins in published CLI bundles

When CLI or dashboard runtime code imports workspace plugin packages (for example @fusion-plugin-examples/roadmap), those imports must stay statically analyzable and covered by packages/cli/tsup.config.ts noExternal rules so plugin runtime code is inlined into dist/bin.js.

Do not introduce dynamic or variable module specifiers for workspace plugin runtime paths in the published execution path. If a workspace plugin is needed for bundled auto-install, stage a bundled plugin entry (dist/plugins/<id>/bundled.js) rather than copying raw TypeScript source into dist/.

Full documentation

Architecture details, development setup, and contributor info live in the project README.

License

MIT — see LICENSE.