e3055f8d93
- Add optional globalDir parameter to resolveProject(), getDefaultProject(), setDefaultProject(), and clearDefaultProject() for test isolation - Remove ESLint suppression by using void operator for intentionally unused var - Update all tests to use isolated globalDir parameter - Complete tests for default project resolution
196 lines
9.0 KiB
JSON
196 lines
9.0 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"id": "KB-145",
|
|
"description": "Need edit button on task modal",
|
|
"column": "done",
|
|
"dependencies": [],
|
|
"steps": [
|
|
{
|
|
"name": "Preflight",
|
|
"status": "done"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"name": "Add edit state and handlers to TaskDetailModal",
|
|
"status": "done"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"name": "Add edit button and inline editing UI",
|
|
"status": "done"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"name": "Add styling for modal edit mode",
|
|
"status": "done"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"name": "Testing & Verification",
|
|
"status": "done"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"name": "Documentation & Delivery",
|
|
"status": "done"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"currentStep": 6,
|
|
"log": [
|
|
{
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T13:58:01.215Z",
|
|
"action": "Task created"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T14:22:09.822Z",
|
|
"action": "Spec review requested"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T14:28:25.253Z",
|
|
"action": "Spec review failed: upstream connect error or disconnect/reset before headers. retried and the latest reset reason: remote connection failure, transport failure reason: delayed connect error: Connection refused"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T14:31:34.689Z",
|
|
"action": "Spec review requested"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T14:31:53.976Z",
|
|
"action": "Spec review: APPROVE",
|
|
"outcome": "This is a well-structured specification for adding inline editing capability to the TaskDetailModal. The spec correctly identifies the existing TaskCard editing pattern to replicate, references real files and functions, and provides concrete, verifiable outcomes for each step. Testing requirements are comprehensive with real automated test scenarios. File scope is accurate and dependencies are correctly identified as none (uses existing APIs)."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T14:57:53.516Z",
|
|
"action": "Worktree created at /Users/eclipxe/Projects/kb/.worktrees/fresh-cliff"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T14:57:53.516Z",
|
|
"action": "Step 0 (Preflight) → pending"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T14:57:58.941Z",
|
|
"action": "Step 0 (Preflight) → in-progress"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T14:58:05.276Z",
|
|
"action": "Step 0 (Preflight) → done"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T14:58:05.277Z",
|
|
"action": "Step 0 complete - Reviewed TaskCard editing pattern, confirmed updateTask API, and identified EDITABLE_COLUMNS pattern for triage/todo columns"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T14:58:06.488Z",
|
|
"action": "plan review requested for Step 1 (Add edit state and handlers to TaskDetailModal)"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T14:58:16.673Z",
|
|
"action": "plan review Step 1: APPROVE",
|
|
"outcome": "The plan for Step 1 correctly identifies all necessary state variables, handlers, and lifecycle management needed for inline editing in TaskDetailModal. It follows the established TaskCard pattern (lines 76-280) and properly leverages the existing `updateTask` import (already present at line 5 in TaskDetailModal.tsx). The step is appropriately scoped to state/handler setup only, deferring UI integration to Step 2."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T14:58:18.717Z",
|
|
"action": "Step 1 (Add edit state and handlers to TaskDetailModal) → in-progress"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T14:58:42.564Z",
|
|
"action": "code review requested for Step 1 (Add edit state and handlers to TaskDetailModal)"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T14:59:07.215Z",
|
|
"action": "code review Step 1: APPROVE",
|
|
"outcome": "The Step 1 implementation correctly adds all required edit state variables, handlers, and keyboard shortcuts to TaskDetailModal. The code follows the TaskCard editing pattern, uses proper React hooks with memoization, and handles all edge cases specified in the requirements."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T14:59:08.829Z",
|
|
"action": "Step 1 (Add edit state and handlers to TaskDetailModal) → done"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T14:59:08.829Z",
|
|
"action": "Step 2 (Add edit button and inline editing UI) → in-progress"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T14:59:08.830Z",
|
|
"action": "plan review requested for Step 2 (Add edit button and inline editing UI)"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T14:59:35.832Z",
|
|
"action": "plan review Step 2: APPROVE",
|
|
"outcome": "The plan for Step 2 is well-structured and achievable. The edit state and handlers from Step 1 are already properly implemented in `TaskDetailModal.tsx` (lines 98-178). Step 2 focuses on the UI layer: adding the Edit button to the header, conditionally rendering input fields instead of the static title, and adding Save/Cancel buttons. The approach mirrors the existing `TaskCard` editing pattern and leverages the `EDITABLE_COLUMNS` restriction already in place."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T15:00:29.966Z",
|
|
"action": "code review requested for Step 2 (Add edit button and inline editing UI)"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T15:01:04.450Z",
|
|
"action": "code review Step 2: REVISE",
|
|
"outcome": "The core editing functionality is correctly implemented in `TaskDetailModal.tsx` with proper state management, keyboard shortcuts, and the edit form UI. However, **the required CSS styles for `modal-edit-*` classes are missing**, despite being explicitly listed as a Step 2 artifact in the PROMPT.md. The JSX references multiple CSS classes (`.modal-edit-form`, `.modal-edit-input`, `.modal-edit-textarea`, `.modal-edit-actions`, `.modal-edit-hint`, `.modal-edit-btn`, `.modal-header-actions`) that d"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T15:01:05.944Z",
|
|
"action": "Code review for Step 2 identified missing CSS styles for modal edit mode. Adding .modal-edit-* classes now."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T15:01:16.876Z",
|
|
"action": "code review requested for Step 2 (Add edit button and inline editing UI)"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T15:01:40.011Z",
|
|
"action": "code review Step 2: APPROVE",
|
|
"outcome": "The implementation successfully adds the edit button and inline editing UI to the TaskDetailModal component. The code follows the existing TaskCard editing pattern, uses the correct EDITABLE_COLUMNS constraint, and properly integrates with the updateTask API. All required CSS classes are present and the modal structure correctly hides tab content during edit mode."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T15:01:41.609Z",
|
|
"action": "Step 2 (Add edit button and inline editing UI) → done"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T15:01:41.611Z",
|
|
"action": "Step 3 (Add styling for modal edit mode) → done"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T15:01:41.613Z",
|
|
"action": "Step 4 (Testing & Verification) → in-progress"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T15:01:41.615Z",
|
|
"action": "plan review requested for Step 4 (Testing & Verification)"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T15:01:53.010Z",
|
|
"action": "plan review Step 4: APPROVE",
|
|
"outcome": "The testing plan for Step 4 is thorough and well-structured. The 13 test cases comprehensively cover all functional aspects of the new inline editing feature in TaskDetailModal, including visibility conditions, edit mode behavior, save/cancel operations, keyboard shortcuts, and error handling. The test patterns align with existing tests in the file."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T15:05:06.100Z",
|
|
"action": "code review requested for Step 4 (Testing & Verification)"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T15:05:41.249Z",
|
|
"action": "code review Step 4: APPROVE",
|
|
"outcome": "The implementation of Step 4 is comprehensive and well-executed. All 13 test cases for the inline editing feature are present and properly structured. The tests use React Testing Library patterns correctly, mocking the API layer and verifying component behavior. State management follows React best practices with proper use of `useState`, `useEffect`, and `useCallback`. CSS classes are properly namespaced and follow the existing styling conventions."
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T15:05:42.994Z",
|
|
"action": "Step 4 (Testing & Verification) → done"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T15:05:42.995Z",
|
|
"action": "Step 5 (Documentation & Delivery) → in-progress"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T15:05:51.781Z",
|
|
"action": "Step 5 (Documentation & Delivery) → done"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T15:05:51.782Z",
|
|
"action": "Step 5 (Documentation & Delivery) → done"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"timestamp": "2026-03-30T15:05:51.783Z",
|
|
"action": "Task marked done by agent"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"columnMovedAt": "2026-03-30T15:06:03.786Z",
|
|
"createdAt": "2026-03-30T13:58:01.215Z",
|
|
"updatedAt": "2026-03-30T15:06:03.786Z",
|
|
"modelProvider": "fireworksai",
|
|
"modelId": "accounts/fireworks/routers/kimi-k2p5-turbo",
|
|
"validatorModelProvider": "fireworksai",
|
|
"validatorModelId": "accounts/fireworks/routers/kimi-k2p5-turbo",
|
|
"size": "S",
|
|
"reviewLevel": 2
|
|
} |